No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restorationa)
1.Bailey, P. J. , and Herrmann, P. (1993). “A reexamination of duplex perception evoked by intensity differences,” Percept. Psychophys. 54, 20–32.
2.Bashford, J. A. , Jr., Riener, K. R. , and Warren, R. M. (1992). “Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations,” Percept. Psychophys. 51, 211–217.
3.Bashford, J. A. , Jr., Warren, R. M. , and Brown, C. A. (1996). “Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong ‘bottom-up’ cues for phonemic restoration,” Percept. Psychophys. 58, 342–350.
4.Bentin, S. , and Mann, V. (1990). “Masking and stimulus intensity effects on duplex perception: A confirmation of the dissociation between speech and nonspeech modes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 64–74.
5.Best, V. , Gallun, F. J. , Ihlefeld, A. , and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2006). “The influence of spatial separation on divided listening,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1506–1516.
6.Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound (MIT, Cambridge, MA).
7.Carlyon, R. P. , Cusack, R. , Foxton, J. M. , and Robertson, I. H. (2001). “Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 115–127.
10.Darwin, C. J. (1995). “Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: A quantitative test of the ‘Old-plus-New’ heuristic,” in Levels in Speech Communication: Relations and Interactions: A Tribute to Max Wajskop, edited by J. C. Sorin, H. Meloni, and J. Schoenigen, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 1–12.
11.Darwin, C. J. (2005). “Simultaneous grouping and auditory continuity,” Percept. Psychophys. 67, 1384–1390.
12.Darwin, C. J. , Akeroyd, M. A. , and Hukin, R. W. (2002). “Binaural factors in auditory continuity,” International Conference on Auditory Displays, Kyoto, Japan.
13.Darwin, C. J. , and Carlyon, R. P. (1995). “Auditory grouping,” in Hearing, edited by B. C. J. Moore, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 387–424.
14.Darwin, C. J. , and Ciocca, V. (1992). “Grouping in pitch perception: Effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3381–3390.
15.Darwin, C. J. , and Hukin, R. W. (1997). “Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference and frequency proximity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2316–2324.
16.Darwin, C. J. , and Hukin, R. W. (1998). “Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference in conjunction with mistuning and onset asynchrony,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 1080–1084.
18.Dyson, B. J. , and Quinlan, P. T. (2003). “Feature and conjunction processing in the auditory modality,” Percept. Psychophys. 65, 254–272.
19.Freyman, R. L. , Balakrishnan, U. , and Helfer, K. S. (2001). “Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2112–2122.
20.Hall, M. D. , Pastore, R. E. , Acker, B. E. , and Huang, W. (2000). “Evidence for auditory feature integration with spatially distributed items,” Percept. Psychophys. 62, 1243–1257.
22.Hill, N. I. , and Darwin, C. J. (1996). “Lateralization of a perturbed harmonic: Effects of onset asynchrony and mistuning,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 2352–2364.
23.Hukin, R. W. , and Darwin, C. J. (1995). “Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification,” Percept. Psychophys. 57, 191–196.
25.Kashino, M. , and Warren, R. M. (1996). “Binaural release from temporal induction,” Percept. Psychophys. 58, 899–905.
26.Liberman, A. M. , Isenberg, D. , and Rakerd, B. (1981). “Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode,” Percept. Psychophys. 30, 133–143.
27.McAdams, S. (1989). “Segregation of concurrent sounds. I. Effects of frequency modulation coherence,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 2148–2159.
29.Petkov, C. I. , O’Connor, K. N. , and Sutter, M. L. (2007). “Encoding of illusory continuity in primary auditory cortex,” Neuron 54, 153–165.
30.Powers, G. L. , and Wilcox, J. C. (1977). “Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 195–199.
31.Remez, R. E. (2005). “Perceptual organization of speech,” in Handbook of Speech Perception, edited by D. B. Pisoni and R. E. Remez, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 28–50.
32.Repp, B. H. (1984). “Against a role of ‘chirp’ identification in duplex perception,” Percept. Psychophys. 35, 89–93.
33.Repp, B. H. , Milburn, C. , and Ashkenas, J. (1983). “Duplex perception: Confirmation of fusion,” Percept. Psychophys. 33, 333–337.
34.Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. , Lee, A. K. , and Oxenham, A. J. (2007). “A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 12223–12227.
35.Sussman, E. S. , Horvath, J. , Winkler, I. , and Orr, M. (2007). “The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams,” Percept. Psychophys. 69, 136–152.
37.Verschuure, J. , and Brocaar, M. P. (1983). “Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise,” Percept. Psychophys. 33, 232–240.
39.Warren, R. M. , Bashford, J. A. , Jr., Healy, E. W. , and Brubaker, B. S. (1994). “Auditory induction: Reciprocal changes in alternating sounds,” Percept. Psychophys. 55, 313–322.
40.Warren, R. M. , Hainsworth, K. R. , Brubaker, B. S. , Bashford, J. A. , Jr., and Healy, E. W. (1997). “Spectral restoration of speech: Intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps,” Percept. Psychophys. 59, 275–283.
41.Whalen, D. H. , and Liberman, A. M. (1996). “Limits on phonetic integration in duplex perception,” Percept. Psychophys. 58, 857–870.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month