No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception
2.Bird, J. , and Darwin, C. J. (1998). “Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences,” in Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing, edited by A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, A. Q. Summerfield, and R. Meddis (Whurr, London), pp. 263–269.
, and Weenink
). “Praat: Doing phonetic by computer
,” version 4.3.14 (computer program), http://www.praat.org
. Last accessed 10 August 2007.
4.Bolia, R. S. , Nelson, W. T. , Ericson, M. A. , and Simpson, B. D. (2000). “A speech corpus for multitalker communications research,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1065–1066.
6.Bradlow, A. R. , and Pisoni, D. B. (1999). “Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2074–2085.
7.Bradlow, A. R. , Torretta, G. M. , and Pisoni, D. B. (1996). “Intelligibility of normal speech. I. Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics,” Speech Commun. 20, 255–272.
8.Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organisation of Sound (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
9.Brokx, J. P. L. , and Nooteboom, S. G. (1982). “Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices,” J. Phonetics 10, 23–36.
10.Brungart, D. S. (2001). “Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1101–1109.
11.Brungart, D. S. , Chang, P. S. , Simpson, B. D. , and Wang, D. (2006). “Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 4007–4018.
12.Callan, D. E. , Jones, J. A. , Callan, A. M. , and Akahane-Yamada, R. (2004). “Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models,” Neuroimage 22, 1182–1194.
13.Carhart, R. , Tillman, T. W. , and Greetis, E. S. (1969). “Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 45, 694–703.
16.Cooke, M. P. , Barker, J. , Cunningham, S. P. , and Shao, X. (2006). “An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2421–2424.
17.Cooke, M. P. , Green, P. D. , and Crawford, M. D. (1994). “Handling missing data in speech recognition,” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 1555–1558.
19.Cutler, A. , Weber, A. , Smits, R. , and Cooper, N. (2004). “Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3668–3678.
20.Darwin, C. J. , and Hukin, R. W. (2000). “Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 970–977.
48.Darwin, C. J. , Brungart, D. S. , and Simpson, B. D. (2003). “Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2913–2922.
22.Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725–1736.
23.Florentine, M. , Buus, S. , Scharf, B. , and Canevet, G. (1984). “Speech reception thresholds in noise for native and non-native listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, s84 (abstract).
24.Freyman, R. L. , Balakrishnan, U. , and Helfer, K. S. (2004). “Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2246–2256.
25.Garcia Lecumberri, M. L. , and Cooke, M. P. (2006). “Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2445–2454.
26.Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, Interaction and the Second Language Learner (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).
27.Hazan, V. , and Markham, D. (2004). “Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility in adults and children,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3108–3118.
28.Hazan, V. , and Simpson, A. (2000). “The effect of cue-enhancement on consonant intelligibility in noise: Speaker and listener effects,” Lang Speech 43, 273–294.
29.Ikeno, A. , and Hansen, H. L. (2006). “Perceptual recognition cues in native English accent variation: Listener accent, perceived accent, and comprehension,” International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, Toulouse, France, pp. 401–404.
30.Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
31.Lisker, L. (1986). “Voicing in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling versus in trochees,” Lang Speech 29, 3–11.
32.Mayo, L. H. , Florentine, M. , and Buus, S. (1997). “Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40, 686–693.
33.McAllister, R. (1997). “Perceptual foreign accent: L2 users’ comprehension ability,” in Second Language Speech: Structure and Process, edited by A. James and J. Leather (Mouton de Gruyter, New York).
34.Meador, D. , Flege, J. E. , and MacKay, I. R. (2000). “Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language,” Bilingualism: Lang. Cognit. 3, 55–67.
36.Mueller, J. L. (2005). “Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing,” Second Lang. Res. 21, 152–174.
38.Remez, R. E. , Rubin, P. E. , Berns, S. M. , Pardo, J. S. , and Lang, J. M. (1994). “On the perceptual organization of speech,” Psychol. Rev. 101, 129–156.
39.Rhebergen, K. S. , Versfeld, N. J. , and Dreschler, W. A. (2005). “Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 1274–1277.
40.Rogers, C. L. , Lister, J. J. , Febo, D. M. , Besing, J. M. , and Abrams, H. B. (2006). “Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing,” Appl. Psycholinguist. 27, 465–485.
41.Simpson, S. , and Cooke, M. P. (2005). “Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a non-monotonic function of N,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 2775–2778.
42.Strange, W. (1995). Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience (York, Timonium, MD).
43.Studebaker, G. A. (1985). “A “rationalized” arcsine transform,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 455–462.
44.Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Principles of Phonology (Grundzüge der Phonologie) (University of California Press, Berkeley).
45.Van Engen, K. J. , and Bradlow, A. R. (2007). “Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 519–526.
46.van Wijngaarden, S. J. , Bronkhorst, A. W. , Houtgast, T. , and Steeneken, H. J. M. (2004). “Using the Speech Transmission Index for predicting non-native speech intelligibility,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1281–1291.
47.van Wijngaarden, S. J. , Steeneken, H. J. M. , and Houtgast, T. (2002). “Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1906–1916.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month