Index of content:
Volume 123, Issue 3, March 2008
- PHYSIOLOGICAL ACOUSTICS 
123(2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2828209View Description Hide Description
Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) measured using a suppressor tone in human ears are analogous to two-tone suppression responses measured mechanically and neurally in mammalian cochleae. SFOAE suppression was measured in 24 normal-hearing adults at octave frequencies over a range of probe levels . Suppressor frequencies ranged from to 0.7 octaves re: , and suppressor levels ranged from just detectable suppression to full suppression. The lowest suppression thresholds occurred for “best” slightly higher than SFOAE growth of suppression (GOS) had slopes close to one at frequencies much lower than best , and shallow slopes near best , which indicated compressive growth close to . Suppression tuning curves constructed from GOS functions were well defined at 1, 2, and , but less so at 0.5 and . Tuning was sharper at lower with an equivalent rectangular bandwidth similar to that reported behaviorally for simultaneous masking. The tip-to-tail difference assessed cochlear gain, increasing with decreasing and increasing at the lowest from 32 to for from 1 to . SFOAE suppression provides a noninvasive measure of the saturating nonlinearities associated with cochlear amplification on the basilar membrane.
Comparison between otoacoustic and auditory brainstem response latencies supports slow backward propagation of otoacoustic emissions123(2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2836781View Description Hide Description
Experimental measurements of the latency of transient evoked otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem responses are compared, to discriminate between different cochlear models for the backward acoustic propagation of otoacoustic emissions. In most transmission-line cochlear modelsotoacoustic emissions propagate towards the base as a slow transverse traveling wave, whereas other models assume fast backward propagation via longitudinal compression waves in the fluid. Recently, sensitive measurements of the basilar membrane motion have cast serious doubts on the existence of slow backward traveling waves associated with distortion product otoacoustic emissions [He et al., Hear. Res.228, 112–122 (2007)]. On the other hand, recent analyses of “Allen–Fahey” experiments suggest instead that the slow mechanism transports most of the otoacoustic energy [Shera et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am.122, 1564–1575 (2007)]. The two models can also be discriminated by comparing accurate estimates of the otoacoustic emission latency and of the auditory brainstem response latency. In this study, this comparison is done using human data, partly original, and partly from the literature. The results are inconsistent with fast otoacoustic propagation, and suggest that slow traveling waves on the basilar membrane are indeed the main mechanism for the backward propagation of the otoacoustic energy.
123(2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2832615View Description Hide Description
In 2004, Sininger and Cone-Wesson examined asymmetries in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of otoacoustic emissions(OAE) in infants, reporting that distortion-product (DP)OAE SNR was larger in the left ear, whereas transient-evoked (TE)OAE SNR was larger in the right. They proposed that cochlear and brainstem asymmetries facilitate development of brain-hemispheric specialization for sound processing. Similarly, in 2006 Sininger and Cone-Wesson described ear asymmetries mainly favoring the right ear in infant auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). The present study analyzed 2640 infant responses to further explore these effects. Ear differences in OAE SNR, signal, and noise were evaluated separately and across frequencies (1.5, 2, 3, and ), and ABR asymmetries were compared with cochlear asymmetries. Analyses of ear-canal reflectance and admittance showed that asymmetries in middle-ear functioning did not explain cochlear and brainstem asymmetries. Current results are consistent with earlier studies showing right-ear dominance for TEOAE and ABR. Noise levels were higher in the right ear for OAEs and ABRs, causing ear asymmetries in SNR to differ from those in signal level. No left-ear dominance for DPOAE signal was observed. These results do not support a theory that ear asymmetries in cochlear processing mimic hemispheric brain specialization for auditory processing.
123(2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2828064View Description Hide Description
The “classical” view on wave propagation is that propagating waves are possible in both directions along the length of the basilar membrane and that they have identical properties. Results of several recently executed experiments [T. Ren, Nat. Neurosci.2, 333–334 (2004) and W. X. He, A. L. Nuttall, and T. Ren, Hear. Res., 228, 112–122 (2007)] appear to contradict this view. In the current work measurements were made of the velocity of the guinea-pig basilar membrane (BM). Distortion products (DPs) were produced by presenting two primary tones, with frequencies below the characteristic frequency of the BM location at which the BM measurements were made, with a constant frequency ratio. In each experiment the phase of the principal DP, with frequency , was recorded as a function of the DP frequency. The results indicate that the DP wave going from the two-tone interaction region toward the stapes is not everywhere traveling in the reverse direction, but also in the forward direction. The extent of the region in which the forward wave occurs appears larger than is accounted for by classical theory. This property has been termed “inverted direction of wave propagation.” The results of this study confirm the wave propagation findings of other authors. The experimental data are compared to theoretical predictions for a classical three-dimensional model of the cochlea that is based on noise-response data of the same animal. Possible physical mechanisms underlying the findings are discussed.
123(2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2836786View Description Hide Description
Forward-masked psychophysical spatial tuning curves (fmSTCs) were measured in twelve cochlear-implant subjects, six using bipolar stimulation (Nucleus devices) and six using monopolar stimulation (Clarion devices). fmSTCs were measured at several probe levels on a middle electrode using a fixed-level probe stimulus and variable-level maskers. The average fmSTC slopes obtained in subjects using bipolar stimulation were approximately three times steeper than average slopes obtained in subjects using monopolar stimulation . Average spatial bandwidths were about half as wide for subjects with bipolar stimulation than for subjects with monopolar stimulation . None of the tuning curve characteristics changed significantly with probe level. fmSTCs replotted in terms of acoustic frequency, using Greenwood’s [J. Acoust. Soc. Am.33, 1344–1356 (1961)] frequency-to-place equation, were compared with forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves obtained previously from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired acoustic listeners. The average tuning characteristics of fmSTCs in electric hearing were similar to the broad tuning observed in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired acoustic listeners at high stimulus levels. This suggests that spatial tuning is not the primary factor limiting speech perception in many cochlear implant users.