No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustical objective measures in reverberant sound fields
1.M. Morimoto, Hi. Sato, and M. Kobayashi, “Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1607–1613 (2004).
2.Hi. Sato, J. Bradley, and M. Morimoto, “Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1157–1167 (2005).
4.T. Houtgast and H. J. M. Steeneken, “The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility,” Acustica 28, 66–73 (1973).
5.J. S. Bradley, “Relationships among measures of speech intelligibility in rooms,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 46, 396–405 (1998).
6.M. Kobayashi, M. Morimoto, Hi. Sato, and Ha. Sato, “Optimum speech level to minimize listening difficulty in public spaces,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 251–256 (2007).
7.S. Sakamoto, Y. Suzuki, S. Amano, K. Ozawa, T. Kondo, and T. Sone, “New lists for word intelligibility test based on word familiarity and phonetic balance,” J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. 54, 842–849 (1998). (in Japanese)
8.Y. Nishikawa, Hi. Sato, S. Inoue, and Y. Kobayashi, “Evaluation of speech transmission performance with impulse response in rooms,” J. Environ. Eng. 605, 9–14 (2006). (in Japanese).
9.Ha. Sato, M. Morimoto, A. Hakamada, M. Kobayashi, and Hi. Sato, “Learning effect and reduction of context effect on listening difficulty for words,” Memoirs of Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, 22, 47–57 (2004). (in Japanese).
10.R. Thiele, “Richtungsverteilung und Zeitfolge der Schallrückwürfe in Räumen,” Acustica 3, 291–302 (1953). (Title in English: “Directional distribution and time sequence of sound reflections in rooms.”)
12.R. Kürer, “Zur Gewinnung von Einzahlkriterien bei Impulsmessungen in der Raumakustik,” Acustica 21, 370–372 (1969). (Title in English: “Extraction of single-number criteria from impulse measurements of room acoustics.”)
13.T. Houtgast and H. J. M. Steeneken, “A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1069–1077 (1985).
14.ANSI S3.5-1997, Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index (American National Standards Institute, New York, 1997).
15.M. R. Schroeder, “New method of measuring reverberation time,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 38, 409–412 (1965).
16.B. S. Everitt, The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
17.B. C. J. Moore, An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing (Academic, London, 1982), pp. 168–171.
18.S. R. Bistafa and J. S. Bradley, “Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 861–875 (2000).
19.M. Barron, Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design (E & FN Spon, London, 1993), pp. 418–419.
20.ISO 19921: 2003, Ergonomics—Assessment of Speech Communication in Rooms (International Organization of Standardization, Geneva, 2003).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month