No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Tuning in the spatial dimension: Evidence from a masked speech identification task
1.American National Standards Institute. (2004). American national standard specification for audiometers. ANSI 3.6–2004
1.Arbogast, T. L. , and Kidd, G. , Jr. (2000). “Evidence for spatial tuning in informational masking using the probe-signal method,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1803–1810.
2.Arbogast, T. L. , Mason, C. R. , and Kidd, G. , Jr. (2002). “The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2086–2098.
3.Best, V. , Gallun, F. J. , Ihlefeld, A. , and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2006). “The influence of spatial separation on divided listening,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1506–1516.
4.Best, V. , Ozmeral, E. , Gallun, F. J. , Sen, K. , and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2005). “Spatial unmasking of birdsong in human listeners: Energetic and informational factors,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3766–3773.
5.Boehnke, S. E. , and Phillips, D. P. (1999). “Azimuthal tuning of human perceptual channels for sound location,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 1948–1955.
6.Bolia, R. S. , Nelson, W. T. , Ericson, M. A. , and Simpson, B. D. (2000). “A speech corpus for multitalker communications research,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1065–1066.
7.Bronkhorst, A. (2000). “The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions,” Acust. Acta Acust. 86, 117–128.
8.Bronkhorst, A. W. , and Plomp, R. (1992). “Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 3132–3139.
9.Brungart, D. S. , Chang, P. S. , Simpson, B. D. , and Wang, D. (2006). “Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 4007–4018.
10.Brungart, D. S. , Simpson, B. D. , Ericson, M. A. , and Scott, K. R. (2001). “Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2527–2538.
11.Carlile, S. , Hyams, S. , and Delaney, S. (2001). “Systematic distortions of auditory space perception following prolonged exposure to broadband noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 416–424.
12.Culling, J. F. , Hawley, M. L. , and Litovsky, R. Y. (2004). “The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1057–1065.
13.Culling, J. F. , Hodder, K. I. , and Toh, C. Y. (2003). “Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2871–2876.
14.Drennan, W. R. , Gatehouse, S. , and Lever, C. (2003). “Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: The role of spatial location,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2178–2189.
15.Drennan, W. R. , Won, J. H. , Dasika, V. K. , and Rubenstein, J. T. (2007). “Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8, 373–383.
16.Durlach, N. I. , Mason, C. R. , Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. , Arbogast, T. L. , Colburn, H. S. , and Kidd, G. , Jr. (2003). “Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 368–379.
17.Freyman, R. L. , Helfer, K. S. , McCall, D. D. , and Clifton, R. K. (1999). “The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 3578–3588.
18.Glasberg, B. R. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1986). “Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 1020–1033.
19.Goldberg, J. M. , and Brown, P. B. (1968). “Responses of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: Physiological mechanisms of sound localization,” J. Neurophysiol. 32, 613–636.
20.Greenberg, G. Z. , and Larkin, W. D. (1968). “Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: The probe-signal method,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 1513–1523.
21.Hawley, M. L. , Litovsky, R. Y. , and Culling, J. F. (2004). “The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 833–843.
22.Helfer, K. S. (1992). “Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 1394–1401.
23.Hill, N. I. , Bailey, P. J. , and Hodgson, P. (1998). “A probe-signal study of auditory discrimination of complex sounds,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2291–2296.
24.Kidd, G. , Jr., Arbogast, T. L. , Mason, C. R. , and Gallun, F. J. (2005b). “The advantage of knowing where to listen,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3804–3815.
25.Kidd, G. , Jr., Mason, C. R. , Brughera, A. , and Hartmann, W. M. (2005a). “The role of reverberation in release from masking due to spatial separation of sources for speech identification,” Acust. Acta Acust. 91, 526–536.
26.Kidd, G. , Jr., Mason, C. R. , Rohtla, T. L. , and Deliwala, P. S. (1998). “Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 422–431.
27.King, A. J. , Bajo, V. M. , Bizley, J. K. , Campbell, R. A. A. , Nodal, F. R. , Schulz, J. , and Schnupp, J. W. H. (2007). “Physiological and behavioral studies of spatial coding in the auditory cortex,” Hear. Res. 229, 106–115.
29.Li, L. , Daneman, M. , Qi, J. G. , and Schneider, B. A. (2004). “Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults?,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 1077–1091.
30.Middlebrooks, J. C. , and Pettigrew, J. D. (1981). “Functional classes of neurons in primary auditory cortex of the cat distinguished by sensitivity to sound location,” J. Neurosci. 1, 107–120.
31.Neff, D. L. , and Dethlefs, T. M. (1995). “Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 125–134.
32.Noble, W. , and Perrett, S. (2002). “Hearing speech against spatially separate competing speech versus competing noise,” Percept. Psychophys. 64, 1325–1336.
34.Patterson R. D. , Nimmo-Smith, I. , Weber, D. L. , and Milroy, R. (1982). “The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 1788–1803.
35.Peissig, J. , and Kollmeier, B. (1997). “Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1660–1670.
36.Plomp, R. (1976). “Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility of connected discourse in reverberation as a function of azimuth of a single competing sound source (speech or noise),” Acustica 34, 200–211.
37.Plomp, R. , and Mimpen, A. M. (1981). “Effect of the orientation of the speaker’s head and the azimuth of a noise source on the speech-reception threshold for sentences,” Acustica 48, 325–328.
38.Rhebergen, K. S. , Versfeld, N. J. , and Dreschler, W. A. (2005). “Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 1274–1277.
39.Richards, V. M. , Tang, Z. , and Kidd, G. , Jr. (2002). “Informational masking with small set sizes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1359–1366.
40.Scharf, B. (1998). “Auditory attention: The psychoacoustical approach,” in Attention, edited by H. Pashler (Psychology Press Ltd., Hove, East Sussex) pp. 75–117.
41.Shaw, E. A. G. (1974). “Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58, 1848–1861.
42.Stecker, G. C. , Mickey, B. J. , Macpherson, E. A. , and Middlebrooks, J. C. (2003). “Spatial sensitivity in field PAF of cat auditory cortex,” J. Neurophysiol. 89, 2889–2903.
43.Sterbing, S. J. , Hartung, K. , and Hoffmann, K. P. (2003). “Spatial tuning to virtual sounds in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig,” J. Neurophysiol. 90, 2648–2659.
44.Teder-Salejarvi, W. A. , and Hillyard, S. A. (1998). “The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free-field. An event-related potential study,” Percept. Psychophys. 60, 1228–1242.
45.Teder-Salejarvi, W. A. , Hillyard, S. A. , Roder, B. , and Neville, H. J. (1999). “Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials,” Brain Res. Cognit. Brain Res. 8, 213–227.
46.Tsuchitani, C. (1988). “The inhibition of cat lateral superior olivary unit excitatory responses to binaural tone bursts. I. The transient chopper discharges,” J. Neurophysiol. 59, 164–183.
47.Wright, B. A. , and Dai, H. (1994). “Detection of unexpected tones with short and long durations,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 931–938.
48.Wright, B. A. , and Dai, H. (1998). “Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected rates,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2991–2997.
49.Yin, T. C. , and Chan, J. C. (1990). “Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat,” J. Neurophysiol. 64, 465–488.
50.Yin, T. C. , and Kuwada, S. (1983). “Binaural interaction in low frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat. III. Effects of changing frequency,” J. Neurophysiol. 50, 1020–1042.
51.Zurek, P. M. (1993). “Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility,” in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, 2nd ed., edited by G. A. Studebaker and I. Hockberg (Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA), 255–276.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month