No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users
1.ANSI (1960). American Standard Acoustical Terminology. American National Standards Institute, New York.
2.Galvin, J. , Fu, Q.-J. , and Nogaki, G. (2007). “Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners,” Ear Hear. 28(3), 302–319.
3.Gfeller, K. , Witt, S. , Woodworth, G. , Mehr, M. , and Knutson, J. (2002a). “Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 111(4), 349–356.
4.Gfeller, K. , Witt, S. , Adamek, M. , Mehr, M. , Rogers, J. , Stordahl, J. , and Ringgenberg, S. (2002b). “Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol 13(3), 132–145.
5.Geurts, L. , and Wouters, J. (2004). “Better place coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115(2), 844–852.
6.Kasturi, K. , and Loizou, P. (2007). “Effect of filter spacing on melody recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, EL29.
8.Looi, V. , McDermott, H. , McKay, C. , and Hickson, L. (2008). “Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users,” Ear Hear. (in press).
9.McAdams, S. , Winsberg, S. , Donnadieu, D. , De Soete, G. , and Krimphoff, J. (1995). “Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes,” Psychol. Res. 58, 177–192.
10.McDermott, H. (2004). “Music perception with cochlear implants: A review,” Trends Amplif. 8(2), 49–82.
11.Nimmons, G. , Kang, R. , Drennan, W. , Longnion, J. , Ruffin, C. , Worman, T. , Yueh, B. , and Rubinstein, J. (2008). “Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners,” Otol. Neurotol. 29, 149–155.
12.Pijl, S. , and Schwarz, D. (1995). “Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 886–895.
13.Poulin-Charronnat, B. , Bigand, E. , Lalitte, P. , Madurell, F. , Vieillard, S. , and McAdams, S. (2004). “Effects of a change in instrumentation on the recognition of musical materials,” Music Percept. 22, 239–263.
14.Pressnitzer, D. , Bestel, J. , and Frayssec, B. (2005). “Music to electric ears: Pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1060, 343–345.
15.Smith, Z. , Delgutte, B. , and Oxenham, A. (2002). “Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception,” Nature (London) 416, 87–90.
16.Vandali, A. , Whitford, L. , Plant, K. , Clark, G. (2000). “Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system,” Ear Hear. 21, 608–624.
17.Wilson, B. , Finley, C. , Lawson, D. , Wolford, R. , Eddington, D. , and Rabinowitz, W. (1991). “Better speech recognition with cochlear implants,” Nature (London) 352, 236–238.
18.Wolpert, R. (1990). “Recognition of melody, harmonic accompaniment, and instrumentations: Musicians vs. nonmusicians,” Music Percept. 8, 95–106.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month