No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms
46.American National Standards Institute. (2004). American national standard specification for audiometers. ANSI 3.6-2004. New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
1.Arbogast, T. L. , Mason, C. R. , and Kidd, G. , Jr. (2002). “The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2086–2098.
2.Arbogast, T. L. , Mason, C. R. , and Kidd, G. , Jr. (2005).“The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2169–2180.
3.Best, V. , Gallun, F. J. , Ihlefeld, A. , and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2006). “The influence of spatial separation on divided listening,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1506–1516.
4.Bolia, R. S. , Nelson, W. T. , Ericson, M. A. , and Simpson, B. D. (2000). “A speech corpus for multitalker communications research,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1065–1066.
5.Bronkhorst, A. W. , and Plomp, R. (1989). “Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1374–1383.
6.Bronkhorst, A. W. , and Plomp, R. (1992). “Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 3132–3139.
7.Bronkhorst, A. (2000). “The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions,” Acust. Acta Acust. 86, 117–128.
8.Brungart, D. S. , Simpson, B. D. , Ericson, M. A. , and Scott, K. R. (2001). “Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2527–2538.
9.Brungart, D. S. , and Simpson, B. D. (2002). “Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2985–2995.
10.Brungart, D. S. , Chang, P. S. , Simpson, B. D. , and Wang, D. (2006). “Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 4007–4018.
11.Colburn, H. S. , Shinn-Cunningham, B. A. , Kidd, G. , Jr., and Durlach, N. I. (2006). “The perceptual consequences of binaural hearing,” Int. J. Audiol. 45, 34–44.
12.Doherty, K. A. , and Lutfi, R. A. (1999). “Level discrimination of single tones in a multitone complex by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1831–1840.
13.Dubno, J. R. , Ahlstrom, J. B. , and Horwitz, A. R. (2002). “Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 45, 1297–1310.
14.Dubno, J. R. , Ahlstrom, J. B. , and Horwitz, A. R. (2008). “Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 51, 539–556.
15.Duquesnoy, A. J. (1983). “Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 739–743.
16.Ebata, M. (2003). “Spatial unmasking and attention related to the cocktail party problem,” Acoust. Sci. & Tech. 24, 208–219.
17.Freyman, R. L. , Helfer, K. S. , McCall, D. D. , and Clifton, R. K. (1999). “The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 3578–3588.
18.Freyman, R. L. , Balakrishnan, U. , and Helfer, K. S. (2001). “Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2112–2122.
19.Freyman, R. L. , Balakrishnan, U. , and Helfer, K. S. (2004). “Effect of number of masking talkers and priming on informational masking in speech recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2246–2256.
20.Gatehouse, S. , and Noble, W. (2004). “The speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ),” Int. J. Audiol. 43, 85–99.
21.Gelfand, S. A. , Ross, L. , and Miller, S. (1988). “Sentence reception in noise from one versus two sources: Effects of aging and hearing loss,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 248–256.
22.Grose, J. H. , and Hall, J. W. (1996) “Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in listeners with cochlear hearing loss,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 1149–1158.
23.Hawley, M. L. , Litovsky, R. Y. , and Colburn, H. S. (1999). “Speech intelligibility and localization in complex environments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3436–3448.
24.Hawley, M. L. , Litovsky, R. Y. , and Culling, J. F. (2004). “The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 833–843.
25.Helfer, K. S. (1992). “Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 1394–1401.
26.Helfer, K. S. , and Freyman, R. L. (2008). “Aging and speech-on-speech masking,” Ear Hear. 29, 87–98.
27.Humes, L. E. , Lee, J. H. , and Coughlin, M. P. (2006). “Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2926–2937.
28.Kidd, G. , Jr., Mason, C. R. , Rohtla, T. L. , and Deliwala, P. S. (1998) “Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 422–431.
29.Kidd, G. , Jr., Arbogast, T. L. , Mason, C. R. , and Walsh, M. (2002). “Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 107–119.
30.Kidd, G. , Jr., Mason, C. R. , Brughera, A. , and Hartmann, W. M. (2005). “The role of reverberation in release from masking due to spatial separation of sources for speech identification,” Acust. Acta Acust. 91, 526–536.
31.Kidd, G. , Jr., Mason, C. R. , Richards, V. M. , Gallun, F. J. , and Durlach, N. (2008). “Informational masking” in Auditory Perception of Sound Sources, edited by W. A. Yost (Springer, New York), pp. 143–189.
33.Li, L. , Daneman, M. , Qi, J. G. , and Schneider, B. A. (2004). “Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults?,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 1077–1091.
34.Mackersie, C. L. , Prida, T. L. , and Stiles, D. (2001). “The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 44, 19–28.
35.Marrone, N. , Mason, C. R. , and Kidd, G. , Jr. (2008). “Tuning in the spatial dimension: Evidence from a masked speech identification task,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 1146–1158.
36.Noble, W. , and Perrett, S. (2002). “Hearing speech against spatially separate competing speech versus competing noise,” Percept. Psychophys. 64, 1325–1326.
37.Peissig, J. , and Kollmeier, B. (1997).“Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 1660–1670.
38.Pichora-Fuller, M. K. , Schneider, B. A. , and Daneman, M. (1995). “How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 593–608.
40.Rose, M. M. , and Moore, B. C. (1997). “Perceptual grouping of tone sequences by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1768–1778.
41.Shannon, R. V. , Zeng, F. G. , Kamath, V. , Wygonski, J. , and Ekelid, M. (1995). “Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues,” Science 270, 303–304.
42.Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. , Ihlefeld, A. , Satyavarta, and Larson, E. (2005). “Bottom-up and top-down influences on spatial unmasking,” Acust. Acta Acust. 91, 967–979.
43.Ter-Horst, K. , Byrne, D. , and Noble, W. (1993). “Ability of hearing-impaired listeners to benefit from separation of speech in noise,” Aust. J. Audiol. 15, 71–84.
44.Yost, W. A. (1997). “The cocktail party problem: Forty years later” in Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments, edited by R. A. Gilkey and T. R. Anderson (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 329–348.
45.Zurek, P. M. (1993). “Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility” in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, 2nd ed., edited by G. A. Studebaker and I. Hockberg (Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA), pp. 255–276.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month