No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Time-forward speech intelligibility in time-reversed rooms
1.Allen, J. B. , and Berkley, D. A. (1979). “Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 943–950.
2.ANSI-S3.9 (1989). American National Standard Specification for Audiometers (American National Standards Institute, New York).
3.Clifton, R. K. , Freyman, R. L. , Litovsky, R. Y. , and McCall, D. (1994). “Listeners’ expectations about echoes can raise or lower echo threshold,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1525–1533.
4.Freyman, R. L. , Clifton, R. K. , and Litovsky, R. Y. (1991). “Dynamic processes in the precedence effect,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 874–884.
5.Hartmann, W. M. (1997). “Listening in a room and the precedence effect,” in Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments, edited by R. H. Gilkey and T. R. Anderson (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 191–210.
7.Heinz, R. (1993). “Binaural room simulation based on an image source model with addition of statistical methods to include the diffuse sound scattering of walls and to predict the reverberant tail,” Appl. Acoust. 28, 145–159.
8.Houtgast, T. , and Steeneken, H. J. M. (1973). “The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility,” Acustica 28, 66–73.
9.Houtgast, T. , and Steeneken, H. J. M. (1985). “A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1069–1077.
10.Houtsma, A. J. M. , Rossing, T. D. , and Wagenaars, W. M. (1987). “Effects of echoes,” in Auditory Demonstrations (Institute for Perception Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
11.Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA).
12.Nabelek, A. K. , and Robinson, P. K. (1982). “Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1242–1248.
14.Nilsson, M. , Soli, S. D. , and Sullivan, J. A. (1994). “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1085–1099.
15.Régnier, M. S. , and Allen, J. B. (2008). “A method to identify noise-robust perceptual features: application for consonant/t,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 2801–2814.
16.Sabine, W. C. (1922). “Reverberation,” in Collected Papers on Acoustics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
17.Steeneken, H. J. , and Houtgast, T. (1980). “A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 318–326.
18.Watkins, A. J. (2005a). “Perceptual compensation for effects of echo and of reverberation on speech identification,” Acust. Acta Acust. 91, 892–901.
19.Watkins, A. J. (2005b). “Perceptual compensation for effects of reverberation in speech identification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 249–262.
20.Wightman, F. L. , and Kistler, D. J. (1989). “Headphone simulation of free-field listening: I. Stimulus synthesis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 858–867.
Article metrics loading...
The effects of time-reversed room acoustics on word recognition abilities were examined using virtual auditory space techniques, which allowed for temporal manipulation of the room acoustics independent of the speech source signals. Two acoustical conditions were tested: one in which room acoustics were simulated in a realistic time-forward fashion and one in which the room acoustics were reversed in time, causing reverberation and acoustic reflections to precede the direct-path energy. Significant decreases in speech intelligibility—from 89% on average to less than 25%—were observed between the time-forward and time-reversed rooms. This result is not predictable using standard methods for estimating speech intelligibility based on the modulation transfer function of the room. It may instead be due to increased degradation of onset information in the speech signals when room acoustics are time-reversed.
Full text loading...
Most read this month