Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1.Carterette, E. C. , Friedman, M. P. , and Wyman, M. J. (1966). “Feedback and psychophysical variables in signal detection,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39, 10511055.
2.Green, D. M. (1969). “Masking with continuous and pulsed sinusoids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 939946.
3.Lutfi, R. A. , and Alexander, J. M. (2005). “Effects of informational maskers within and across trials,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 322324.
4.Macmillan, N. A. , and Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection Theory; A Users Guide, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).
5.McFadden, D. , and Wright, B. A. (1990). “Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 711724.
6.McFadden, D. , and Wright, B. A. (1992). “Temporal decline of masking and comodulation masking release,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 144156.
7.Purks, S. R. , Callahan, D. J. , Braida, L. D. , and Durlach, N. I. (1980). “Intensity perception. X. Effect of preceding stimulus on identification performance,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 634637.
8.Richards, V. M. , and Neff, D. L. (2004). “Cuing effects for informational masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 289300.
9.Richards, V. M. , Huang, R. , and Kidd, G. , Jr. (2004). “Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 22782288.
10.Sandusky, A. , and Ahumada, A. (1971). “Contrast in detection with gated noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48, 17901794.
11.Viemeister, N. F. (1980). “Adaptation of masking,” in Psychophysical, Physiological, and Behavioral Studies in Hearing, edited by G. van den Brink and F. S. Bilsen (Delft University Press, Delft, The Netherlands), pp. 190198.
12.Wright, B. A. , McFadden, D. , and Champlin, C. A. (1993). “Adaptation of suppression as an explanation of enhancement effects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 7282.

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



The detectability of a tone added to a masker is superior when the detection trial is preceded by the masker than the signal-plus-masker. This auditory enhancement can withstand long temporal gaps between the precursor and the trial, suggesting that for yes/no trials sensitivity may depend on the stimulus presented in the prior trial. The results from an experiment examining the detectability of a tone added to 6-tone maskers confirmed sequential effects on sensitivity. The values of were higher when the prior trial was a no-signal (masker alone) trial compared to a signal (signal-plus-masker) trial.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd