Index of content:
Volume 125, Issue 1, January 2009
- PHYSIOLOGICAL ACOUSTICS 
125(2009); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3037231View Description Hide Description
Although several studies have documented the existence of sex differences in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and transient-evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) in humans, less has been published about sex differences in distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs). Estimates of sex and ear differences were extracted from a data set of OAEmeasurements previously collected for other purposes. In accord with past findings, the sex differences for TEOAEs were substantial for both narrowband and wideband measures. By contrast, the sex differences for DPOAEs were about half the size of those for TEOAEs. In this sample, the ear differences were small for TEOAEs in both sexes and absent for DPOAEs. One implication is that the cochlear mechanisms underlying DPOAEs appear to be less susceptible to whatever influences are responsible for producing sex differences in TEOAEs and SOAEs in humans. We discuss the possibility that differences in the effective level of the stimuli may contribute to these outcomes.
125(2009); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3035842View Description Hide Description
The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) can be used to predict psychophysical electrical-field interaction patterns obtained with simultaneous stimulation of intracochlear electrodes. The second goal was to determine whether ECAP patterns are affected by recording location because differences might influence the relation between ECAP and psychophysicalmeasures. The third goal was to investigate whether symmetrical threshold shifts are produced with phase inversion of the interaction stimulus. Nine adults with Advanced Bionicscochlear implants participated. ECAP and psychophysical thresholds were obtained for basal, middle, and apical probe electrodes in the presence of a subthreshold interaction stimulus delivered simultaneously to each of seven to eight interactionelectrodes per probe. The results showed highly significant correlations between ECAP and psychophysical threshold shifts for all nine subjects, which suggests that the ECAP can adequately predict psychophysical electrical-field interaction patterns for subthreshold stimuli. ECAP thresholds were significantly higher for recordings from the basal (versus apical) side of the probe, which suggests that recording location may affect relations between ECAP and psychophysicalmeasures.Interaction stimulus phase inversion generally produced symmetrical threshold shifts for psychophysicalmeasures but not for half of ECAP measures.