No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Intelligibility of interrupted sentences at subsegmental levels in young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listenersa)
1.ANSI (1969). “American National Standard Methods for Calculation of the Articulation Index,” ANSI S3.5-1969, American National Standards Institute, New York, NY.
2.ANSI (1996). “Specifications for audiometers,” ANSI S3.6-1996, American National Standards Institute, New York, NY.
3.Bergman, M. (1980). “Effects of physical aspects of the message,” in Aging and the Perception of Speech (University Park, Baltimore), pp. 69–78.
4.Bergman, M. , Blumenfeld, V. G. , Cascardo, D. , Dash, B. , Levitt, H. , and Margulies, M. K. (1976). “Age-related decrement in hearing for speech: Sampling and longitudinal studies,” J. Gerontol. 31, 533–538.
5.Cole, R. A. , Yan, Y. H. , Mak, B. , Fanty, M. , and Bailey, T. (1996). “The contribution of consonants versus vowels to word recognition influent speech,” in Proceedings of the ICASSP’96, pp. 853–856.
6.Dorman, M. F. , Marton, K. , Hannley, M. T. , and Lindholm, J. M. (1985). “Phonetic identification by elderly normal and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 664–670.
7.Folstein, M. F. , Folstein, S. E. , and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician,” J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189–198.
8.Fox, R. A. , Wall, L. G. , and Gokcen, J. (1992). “Age-related differences in processing dynamic information to identify vowel quality,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 892–902.
9.Garofolo, J. S. , Lamel, L. F. , Fisher, W. M. , Fiscus, J. G. , Pallett, D. S. , and Dahlgren, N. L. (1990). “DARPA TIMIT acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus CDROM,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, NTIS Order No. PB91–505065.
10.Gordon-Salant, S. (2005). “Hearing loss and aging: New research findings and clinical implications,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. Clin. Suppl. 42, 9–24.
11.Gordon-Salant, S. , and Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1993). “Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 6, 1276–1285.
12.Gordon-Salant, S. , and Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2004). “Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1808–1817.
13.Humes, L. E. (2007). “The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol 18, 590–603.
14.Iyer, N. , Brungart, D. S. , and Simpson, B. D. (2007). “Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1693–1701.
15.Jenkins, J. J. , Strange, W. , and Miranda, S. (1994). “Vowel identification in mixed-speaker silent-center syllables,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1030–1043.
16.Kewley-Port, D. , Burkle, T. Z. , and Lee, J. H. (2007). “Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 2365–2375.
17.Kirikae, I. , Sato, T. , and Shitara, T. (1964). “A study of hearing in advanced age,” Laryngoscope 74, 205–220.
18.Korsan-Bengtsen, M. (1973). “Distorted speech audiometry: A methodological and clinical study,” Acta Oto-Laryngol., Suppl. 310, 1–75.
20.Liberman, A. M. , Harris, K. S. , Hoffman, H. S. , and Griffith, B. C. (1957). “The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries,” J. Exp. Psychol. 54, 358–368.
22.Nelson, P. B. , and Jin, S. H. (2004). “Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2286–2294.
23.Ohde, R. N. , and Abou-Khalil, R. (2001). “Age differences for stop-consonant and vowel perception in adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2156–2166.
26.Redford, M. A. , and Diehl, R. L. (1999). “The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 1555–1565.
27.Strange, W. (1989). “Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 2135–2153.
28.Strange, W. , and Bohn, O. S. (1998). “Dynamic specification of coarticulated German vowels: Perceptual and acoustical studies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 488–504.
29.Strange, W. , Verbrugge, R. R. , Shankweiler, D. P. , and Edman, T. R. (1976). “Consonant environment specifies vowel identity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, 213–224.
30.Studebaker, G. A. (1985). “A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 455–462.
31.Warren, R. M. (1970). “Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds,” Science 23, 392–393.
32.Wingfield, A. , McCoy, S. L. , Peelle, J. E. , Tun, P. A. , and Cox, L. C. (2006). “Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol 17, 487–497.
33.Wingfield, A. , Poon, L. W. , Lombardi, L. , and Lowe, D. (1985). “Speed of processing in normal aging: Effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time,” J. Gerontol. 40, 579–585.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month