NOTICE: Scitation Maintenance Sunday, March 1, 2015.

Scitation users may experience brief connectivity issues on Sunday, March 1, 2015 between 12:00 AM and 7:00 AM EST due to planned network maintenance.

Thank you for your patience during this process.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
A generalized Cramér-Rao lower bound for moving arrays
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
1.E. J. Sullivan and J. V. Candy, “Space-time array processing: A model-based approach,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, No. 5, 28092820 (1997).
2.E. J. Sullivan, J. D. Holmes, W. M. Carey, and J. F. Lynch, “Broadband passive synthetic aperture: Experimental results,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120-EL, 4952 (2006).
3.S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991), Chap. 3.
4.It should be pointed out that in practice, the joint estimate can still outperform the stationary array. This indicates that the CRLB is a highly conservative measure.
5.S. Stergiopoulos, “Optimum bearing resolution for a moving towed array and extension of its physical aperture,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87(5), 21282140 (1990).
6.G. S. Edelson, “On the Estimation of Source Location Using a Passive Towed Array,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rhode Island, 1993.
7.Since we are assuming that the bearing is deterministic, it has no contribution to the prior Fisher matrix. Bell and Van Trees (Ref. 8) refer to this case as the “hybrid” case.
8.K. L. Bell and H. L. Van Trees, “Posterior Cramér-Rao Bound for Tracking Target Bearings,” in Proceedings of the Adaptive Sensor Array Processing Workshop, MIT Lincoln Labs, 7–8 June (2005).
9.The velocity signals do not explicitly contain the acoustic impedance, since we assume that the measured velocities have already been scaled by the impedance, thus converting them to their equivalent pressure units.
10.N. K. Naulai and G. C. Lauchle, “Acoustic intensity methods and their applications to vector sensor use and design,” Penn State Report. No. 2006-01 (2006).
11.The factors of 3 and are a consequence of the inherent directivity of the vector sensors.

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



By properly including the forward motion of the array in the signal model, improved bearing estimation performance for a towed line array can be obtained. The improvement is a consequence of utilizing the bearing information contained in the Doppler. In this paper, it is shown by use of the Cramér-Rao lower bound that, as the array moves forward, the variance on the bearing estimate for an array of pressure sensors decreases, and that if an array of pressure-vector sensors is used, a significant improvement over that obtained for the array using pressure sensors only is obtained.


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A generalized Cramér-Rao lower bound for moving arrays