1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/asa/journal/jasa/125/3/10.1121/1.3062148
1.
1.Galvin, J. , Fu, Q.-J. , and Nogaki, G. (2007). “Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners,” Ear Hear. 28, 302319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000261689.35445.20
2.
2.Galvin, J. , Fu, Q.-J. , and Oba, S. (2008). “Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, EL189EL195.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2961171
3.
3.Geurts, L. , and Wouters, J. (2004). “Better place coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 844852.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1642623
4.
4.Gfeller, K. , Witt, S. , Adamek, M. , Mehr, M. , Rogers, J. , Stordahl, J. , and Ringgenberg, S. (2002). “Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol 13, 132145.
5.
5.Kong, Y.-Y. , Cruz, R. , Jones, J. , and Zeng, F.-G. (2004). “Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing,” Ear Hear. 25, 173185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000120365.97792.2F
6.
6.Looi, V. , McDermott, H. , McKay, C. , and Hickson, L. (2008). “Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users,” Ear Hear. 29, 421434.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d0b
7.
7.Stickney, G. , Assmann, P. , Chang, J. , and Zeng, F.-G. (2007). “Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 10691078.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2750159
8.
8.Vandali, A. E. , Whitford, L. A. , Plant, K. L. , and Clark, G. M. (2000). “Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system,” Ear Hear. 21, 608624.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200012000-00008
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/125/3/10.1121/1.3062148
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/125/3/10.1121/1.3062148
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/125/3/10.1121/1.3062148
2009-02-05
2014-09-22

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users have limited access to fundamental frequency (F0) and timbre cues, which are needed to segregate competing voices and/or musical instruments. In the present study, CI users’ melodic contour identification was measured for three target instruments in the presence of a masker instrument; the F0 of the masker was varied relative to the target instruments. Mean CI performance significantly declined in the presence of the masker, while mean normal-hearing performance was largely unaffected. However, the most musically experienced CI users were able to make use of timbre and F0 differences between instruments.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/125/3/1.3062148.html;jsessionid=mzgyvsk44abd.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/125/3/10.1121/1.3062148&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa

Most read this month

Article
content/asa/journal/jasa
Journal
5
3
Loading

Most cited this month

true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/125/3/10.1121/1.3062148
10.1121/1.3062148
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM