No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners
1.Bond, Z. , and Small, L. H. (1983). “Voicing, vowel, and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech,” Percept. Psychophys. 34, 470–474.
5.Cooper, N. , Cutler, A. , and Wales, R. (2002). “Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners,” Lang Speech 45, 207–228.
6.Cutler, A. (1986). “Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access,” Lang Speech 29, 201–220.
7.Cutler, A. (2005). “Lexical stress,” in The Handbook of Speech Perception, edited by D. B. Pisoni and R. E. Remez (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 264–289.
8.Cutler, A. , and Clifton, C. (1984). “The use of prosodic information in word recognition,” in Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, edited by H. Bouma and D. G. Bouwhuis (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 183–196.
11.Cutler, A. , Norris, D. , and Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2004). “Phonemic repertoire and similarity within the vocabulary,” in Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, edited by S. H. Kim and D. H. Youn (Sunjin Printing Co., Seoul), Vol. 1, pp. 65–68.
10.Cutler, A. , and Pasveer, D. (2006). “Explaining cross-linguistic differences in effects of lexical stress on spoken-word recognition,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Speech Prosody, edited by R. Hoffman and H. Mixdorff (TUD, Dresden), pp. 250–254.
12.Fear, B. D. , Cutler, A. , and Butterfield, S. (1995). “The strong/weak syllable distinction in English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1893–1904.
13.Friedrich, C. K. (2002). “Prosody and spoken word recognition—Behavioral and ERP correlates,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig.
15.Slowiaczek, L. M. (1990). “Effects of lexical stress in auditory word recognition,” Lang Speech 33, 47–68.
17.Small, L. H. , Simon, S. D. , and Goldberg, J. S. (1988). “Lexical stress and lexical access: Homographs versus nonhomographs,” Percept. Psychophys. 44, 272–280.
18.van der Hulst, H. G. (1999). “Word accent,” in Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, H. G. van der Hulst (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin), pp. 3–116.
19.van Donselaar, W. , Koster, M. , and Cutler, A. (2005). “Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 58, 251–273.
20.van Heuven, V. J. (1985). “Perception of stress pattern and word recognition: Recognition of Dutch words with incorrect stress position,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, S21.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month