No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation
1.Bagou, O. , Fougeron, C. , and Frauenfelder, U. H. (2002). “Contribution of prosody to the segmentation and storage of ‘words' in the acquisition of a new minilanguage,” in Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, edited by B. Bel, and I. Marlien (Association pour la promotion de la phonétique et de la linguistique, Aix-en-Provence, France), pp. 159–162.
2.Beckman, M. E. , and Edwards, J. (1990). “Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency,” in Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, edited by J. Kingston, and M. E. Beckman (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 152–178.
3.Betz, M. A. , and Levin, J. R. (1982). “Coherent analysis-of-variance hypothesis testing strategies: A general approach,” J. Educ. Stat. 7, 193–206.
4.Bolinger, D. L. (1978). “Intonation across languages,” in Universals of Human Language, Phonology, Vol. 2, edited by J. H. Greenberg (Stanford University Press, Stanford), pp. 471–524.
5.Campbell, N. , and Beckman, M. E. (1997). “Stress, prominence, and spectral tilt,” in Intonation: Theory, Models, and Applications (Proceedings of a European Speech Communication Assoc. Workshop, September 18–20, 1997), edited by A. Botinis, G. Kouroupetroglou, and G. Carayiannis (ESCA and University of Athens Department of Informatics, Athens), pp. 67–70.
6.Cooper, N. , Cutler, A. , and Wales, R. (2002). “Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners,” Lang Speech 45, 207–228.
7.Cutler, A. (2005). “Lexical stress,” in The Handbook of Speech Perception, edited by D. B. Pisoni, and R. E. Remez (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 264–289.
8.Cutler, A. (2009). “Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners (L),” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3522–3525.
13.Cutler, A. , and Pasveer, D. (2006). “Explaining cross-linguistic differences in effects of lexical stress on spoken-word recognition,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Speech Prosody, edited by R. Hoffman, and H. Mixdorff (TUD, Dresden), pp. 250–254.
15.Cutler, A. , Wales, R. , Cooper, N. , and Janssen, J. (2007). “Dutch listeners’ use of suprasegmental cues to English stress,” in Proceedings of 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, edited by J. Trouvain and W. J. Barry (Saarbrücken, Germany), pp. 1913–1916.
16.van Donselaar, W. , Koster, M. , and Cutler, A. (2005). “Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 58A, 251–273.
17.Dutoit, T. , Pagel, V. , Pierret, N. , Bataille, F. , and van der Vrecken, O. (1996). “The MBROLA project: Towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Lang. Processing, edited by H. T. Bunnell, and W. Idsardi, pp. 1393–1396.
18.Fear, B. D. , Cutler, A. , and Butterfield, S. (1995). “The strong/weak syllable distinction in English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1893–1904.
19.Hay, J. S. F. , and Diehl, R. L. (2007). “Perception of rhythmic grouping: Testing the iambic/trochaic law,” Percept. Psychophys. 69, 113–122.
20.Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
23.Klatt, D. H. (1975). “Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in connected discourse,” J. Phonetics 3, 129–140.
24.Lindblom, B. (1978). “Final lengthening in speech and music,” in Nordic Prosody, edited by E. Gårding, G. Bruce, and R. Bannert (Department of Linguistics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden), pp. 85–100.
28.Newman, R. , Bernstein Ratner, N. , Jusczyk, A. M. , Jusczyk, P. W. , and Dow, K. A. (2006). “Infants’ early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: A retrospective analysis,” Dev. Psychol. 42, 643–655.
30.Norris, D. , McQueen, J. M. , Cutler, A. , and Butterfield, S. (1997). “The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech,” Cognit Psychol. 34, 191–243.
32.Otake, T. , Hatano, G. , and Yoneyama, K. (1996). “Speech segmentation by Japanese listeners,” in Phonological Structure and Language Processing: Cross-Linguistic Studies, edited by T. Otake, and A. Cutler (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin), pp. 183–201.
35.Reber, R. , and Perruchet, P. (2003). “The use of control groups in artificial grammar learning,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 56A, 97–115.
40.Sluijter, A. M. C. , van Heuven, V. J. , and Pacilly, J. J. A. (1997). “Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 503–513.
43.Thiessen, E. D. , and Saffran, J. R. (2004). “Spectral tilt as a cue to word segmentation in infancy and adulthood,” Percept. Psychophys. 66, 779–791.
44.Toro, J. M. , Nespor, M. , Mehler, J. , and Bonatti, L. L. (2008). “Finding words and rules in a speech stream: Functional differences between vowels and consonants,” Psychol. Sci. 19, 137–144.
45.Toro-Soto, J. M. , Rodríguez-Fornells, A. , and Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2007). “Stress placement and word segmentation by Spanish speakers,” Psicologica 28, 167–176.
46.Tyler, M. D. (2006). “French listeners can use stress to segment words in an artificial language,” in Proceedings of the 11th Australasian International Conference on Speech Sci. & Tech., edited by P. Warren, and C. I. Watson (Australasian Speech Sci. and Technol. Assoc. Inc., Auckland, New Zealand), pp. 222–227.
47.Vaissière, J. (1983). “Language-independent prosodic features,” in Prosody: Models and Measurements, edited by A. Cutler, and D. R. Ladd (Springer-Verlag, Hamburg), pp. 53–66.
48.van der Hulst, H. (1999). Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin).
49.van der Lugt, A. H. (2001). “The use of sequential probabilities in the segmentation of speech,” Percept. Psychophys. 63, 811–823.
52.Woodrow, H. (1909). “A quantitative study of rhythm: The effect of variations in intensity, rate, and duration,” Archives of Psychol. 14, 1–66.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month