1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A comparative analysis of acoustic energy models for churches
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1121/1.3205398
/content/asa/journal/jasa/126/4/10.1121/1.3205398
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/126/4/10.1121/1.3205398

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) Shape of the energy decay curve obtained with model observed at different distances from the source. The early reflected energy (from to ) is given by an exponential energy decay having the same time constant of the late part but estimated at a later time (multiplied by ). (b) Shapes of the energy decay curve obtained with the linear model (---) and with the multi-rate exponential model (–––) observed at different distances from the source. Dotted curve represents classical exponential decay.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Plans of the second set of 12 churches surveyed. (a) Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, (b) Basilica of Saint Paul outside-the-walls in Rome, (c) Sant’Ambrogio in Milan, (d) Bari Cathedral, (e) Abbey of Chiaravalle della Colomba in Alseno, (f) Orvieto Cathedral, (g) Santa Maria della Consolazione in Todi, (h) Sant’Andrea in Mantua, (i) Sant’Agnese in Agone in Rome, (j) San Lorenzo in Turin, (k) Santa Maria del Carmelo in Bari, and (l) Padre Pio Pilgrimage church in San Giovanni Rotondo. (Same scale for all the churches.)

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Plot of measured (●) and predicted values of the strength (left), clarity (center), and center time (right) index at 1 kHz vs source-receiver distance according to the three models considered, revised theory (…), model (- - -), and modified theory (—). (a) ACC, (b) SAD, (c) SGR.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

rms error between measured and theoretical values of sound strength (a), clarity (b), and center time (c), at 1 kHz frequency band: theoretical values calculated with revised model, model, and modified model with the new classification. Error bars represent the standard deviation of point-to-point differences between measured and predicted values.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Plot of variations due to bad parameter estimation calculated for strength (left), clarity (center), and center time (right) index at 1 kHz as a function of source-receiver distance according to model (- - -) and modified theory (—). Thicker curves correspond to reference values calculated assuming , , , , , and . Thinner curves correspond to and . Error bars represent variations corresponding to .

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Values of the mean scattering coefficient according to the chancel typology.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Basic details of the first set of churches surveyed.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Basic details of the second set of churches surveyed.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Values of the parameter in the first set of churches surveyed, and corresponding rms errors in the prediction of strength, clarity, and center time.

Generic image for table
TABLE V.

Classification of values according to typological style, with corresponding examples, and mean values.

Generic image for table
TABLE VI.

Incremental values of and according to the architectural characteristics.

Generic image for table
TABLE VII.

Summary of experimental values for each church surveyed, together with those assigned according to the old and the new classifications and absolute differences from experimental values. The variations in rms error resulting from application of the new classification, with reference to prediction of , , and , are also reported for each church.

Generic image for table
TABLE VIII.

Values of the coefficient derived for an application of the and modified models to the second set of churches. (scattering), , , scattering elements, and .

Generic image for table
TABLE IX.

rms error between measured and predicted values of sound strength, clarity, and center time, at frequency bands from 125 Hz to 4 kHz. Predicted values calculated with revised model, modified model, and model.

Generic image for table
TABLE X.

rms average of the difference between errors corresponding to and values assigned in Table VIII and errors obtained when typological class is badly selected. Upper class corresponds to and , whereas lower class corresponds to and . All values refer to at 1 kHz octave band.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/126/4/10.1121/1.3205398
2009-10-06
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A comparative analysis of acoustic energy models for churches
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/126/4/10.1121/1.3205398
10.1121/1.3205398
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM