No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Interrupted speech perception: The effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution
1.American National Standards Institute (ANSI) (1996). American National Standard Specification for Audiometers. ANSI S3.6-1996, New York.
2.Bacon, S. P. , Opie, J. M. , and Montoya, D. Y. (1998). “The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 41, 549–563.
3.Bashford, J. A. , Meyers, M. D. , and Brubaker, B. S. (1988). “Illusory continuity of interrupted speech: Speech rate determines durational limits,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 1635–1638.
4.Dillon, H. (2001). “Prescribing hearing aid performance,” Hearing Aids (Thieme, New York), pp. 234–238.
5.Dubno, J. R. , and Dirks, D. D. (1989). “Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1666–1675.
6.Dubno, J. R. , Horwitz, A. R. , and Ahlstrom, J. B. (2002). “Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2897–2907.
7.George, E. L. , Festen, J. M. , and Houtgast, T. (2006). “Factors affecting masking release for speeding modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2295–2311.
8.Glasberg, B. R. and Moore, B. C. J. (1989). “Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech,” Scand. Audiol. 32, 1–25.
9.Hedrick, M. S. and Carney, E. A. (1997). “Effects of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40, 1445–1457.
10.Hedrick, M. S. and Younger, M. S. (2007). “Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 50, 254–269.
11.Jin, S. -H. and Nelson, P. B. (2006). “Speech perception in gated noise: The effects of temporal resolution,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 3097–3108.
12.Kochkin, S. (2007). “Increasing hearing aid adoption through multiple environmental listening utility,” Hear. J. 60, 28–31.
13.Lorenzi, C. , Micheyl, C. , Berthommier, CF. , and Portalier, S. (1997). “Modulation Masking in Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40, 200–207.
14.Mackersie, C. L. , Prida, T. L. , and Stiles, D. (2001). “The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentence by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 44, 19–28.
15.Moore, B. C. J. and Glasberg, B. R. (1983). “Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, 536–544.
16.Moore, B. C. , Peters, R. W. , and Stone, M. A. (1999). “Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 400–411.
17.Nelson, P. B. , and Jin, S. -H. (2004). “Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2286–2294.
18.Nelson, P. B. , Jin, S. -H. , Carney, A. E. , and Nelson, D. A. (2003). “Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 961–968.
19.Noordhoek, I. M. , Houtgast, T. , and Festen, J. M. (2000). “Measuring the threshold for speech-reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1685–1696.
20.Patterson, R. D. , Nimmo-Smith, I. , Weber, D. L. , and Milroy, R. (1982). “The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 1788–1803.
21.Peters, R. W. , Moore, B. C. , and Baer, T. (1998). “Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 577–587.
22.Qin, M. K. , and Oxenham, A. J. (2003). “Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 446–454.
23.Rhebergen, K. S. , Versfeld, N. J. , and Dreschler, W. A. (2006). “Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 3988–3997.
24.Stone, M. A. , Glasberg, B. R. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1992). “Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method,” Br. J. Audiol. 26, 329–334.
25.van Schijndel, N. H. , Houtgast, T. , and Festen, J. M. (2001). “Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 529–542.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month