No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: Effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience
1.Allan, D. (1992). Oxford Placement Tests 1 (Oxford University Press, United Kingdom).
2.Anderson-Hsieh, J. , Johnson, R. , and Koehler, K. (1992). “The relationship between native speaker judgements of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody and syllable structure,” Lang. Learn. 42, 529–555.
5.Bent, T. , Bradlow, A. R. , and Smith, B. (2008). “Production and perception of temporal patterns in native and non-native speech,” Phonetica 65, 131–147.
6.Bradley, D. C. , Sanchez-Casas, R. M. , and Garcia-Albea, J. E. (1993). “The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English,” Lang. Cognit. Processes 8, 197–233.
7.Bradlow, A. R. , and Pisoni, D. B. (1999). “Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2074–2085.
13.Flege, J. E. (1995). “Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems,” in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, edited by W. Strange (York, Baltimore, MD), pp. 233–277.
14.Flege, J. E. , MacKay, I. R. A. , and Meador, D. (1999). “Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2973–2987.
15.Florentine, M. , Buus, S. , Scharf, B. , and Canevet, G. (1984). “Speech reception thresholds in noise for native and non-native listeners (A),” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, S84.
16.Goetry, V. , and Kolinsky, R. (2000). “The role of rhythmic cues for speech segmentation in monolingual and bilingual listeners,” Psychol. Belg. 40, 115–152.
17.Hayes-Harb, R. , Smith, B. L. , Bent, T. , and Bradlow, A. R. (2008). “The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts,” J. Phonetics 36, 664–679.
18.Holm, S. (2007). “The relative contributions of intonation and duration to intelligibility in Norwegian as a second language,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrucken, Germany, pp. 1653–1656.
19.Huckvale, M. (2006). Speech Filing System (UCL, London, UK).
20.Imai, S. , Walley, A. C. , and Flege, J. E. (2005). “Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects of the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 896–907.
21.Kamiyama, T. (2004). “Perception of foreign accentedness in L2 prosody and segments: L1 Japanese speakers learning L2 French,” Speech Prosody (ISCA Archive, Nara, Japan).
24.Mayo, L. H. , Florentine, M. , and Buus, S. (1997). “Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40, 686–693.
27.Rogers, C. L. , Lister, J. J. , Febo, D. M. , Besing, J. M. , and Abrams, H. B. (2006). “Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing,” Appl. Psycholinguist. 27, 465–485.
28.Sanders, L. D. , Neville, H. J. , and Woldorff, M. G. (2002). “Speech segmentation by native and non-native speakers: The use of lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 45, 519–530.
29.Stibbard, R. M. , and Lee, J. I. (2006). “Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 433–442.
32.van Wijngaarden, S. J. , Steeneken, H. J. M. , and Houtgast, T. (2002). “Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1906–1916.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month