No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationshipa)
1.Battye, A. , Hintze, M. -A. , and Rowlett, P. (2000). The French Language Today: A Linguistic Introduction (Routledge, London).
2.Best, C. T. (1995). “A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception,” in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, edited by W. Strange (York, Timonium, MD), pp. 171–204.
3.Best, C. T. , Faber, A. , and Levitt, A. (1996). “Assimilation of non-native vowel contrasts to the American English vowel system,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 2602.
4.Best, C. T. , and Tyler, M. D. (2007). “Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities,” in Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, edited by O. -S. Bohn and M. J. Munro (John Benjamins, Amsterdam), pp. 13–34.
5.Birdsong, D. (2007). “Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language,” in Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, edited by O. -S. Bohn and M. J. Munro (John Benjamins, Amsterdam), pp. 99–116.
6.Bohn, O. -S. , and Flege, J. E. (1997). “Perception and production of a new vowel category by adult second language learners,” in Second-Language Speech, edited by A. James and J. Leather (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin), pp. 53–73.
7.Bohn, O. -S. , and Steinlen, A. K. (2003). “Consonantal context affects cross-language perception of vowels,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona: Causal Productions, pp. 2289–2292.
8.Bongaerts, T. (1999). “Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners,” in Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Perios Hypothesis, edited by D. Birdsong (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 133–159.
9.Bradlow, A. R. , Pisoni, D. B. , Akahane-Yamada, R. , and Tohkura, Y. (1997). “Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 2299–2310.
10.Deutsch, D. , Dooley, K. , Henthorn, T. , and Head, B. (2009). “Absolute pitch among students in an American music conservatory: Association with tone language fluency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2398–2403.
11.Flege, J. E. (1987). “The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification,” J. Phonetics 15, 47–65.
12.Flege, J. E. (1995). “Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems,” in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, edited by W. Strange (York, Timonium, MD), pp. 233–277.
13.Flege, J. E. , Bohn, O. -S. , and Jang, S. (1997). “Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels,” J. Phonetics 25, 437–470.
14.Flege, J. E. , and Hillenbrand, J. (1984). “Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 708–721.
15.Flege, J. E. , MacKay, I. R. A. , and Meador, D. (1999). “Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2973–2987.
16.Fox, R. A. (1982). “Individual variation in the perception of vowels: Implications for a perception-production link,” Phonetica 39, 1–22.
17.Gottfried, T. L. (1984). “Effects of consonant context on the perception of French vowels,” J. Phonetics 12, 91–114.
18.Gottfried, T. L. , and Beddor, P. S. (1988). “Perception of temporal and spectral information in French vowels,” Lang Speech 31, 57–75.
19.Gottfried, T. L. J. (2007). “Music and language learning,” in Language Experience in Second Language Speech learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, edited by O. S. Bohn and M. J. Munro (John Benjamins, Amsterdam), pp. 221–258.
20.Hillenbrand, J. M. , Clark, M. J. , and Nearey, T. M. (2001). “Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 748–763.
22.Kewley-Port, D. , and Zheng, Y. (1999). “Vowel formant discrimination: Towards more ordinary listening conditions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2945–58.
23.Levy, E. S. (2009a). “Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 1138–1152.
24.Levy, E. S. (2009b). “On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults' French vowel learning,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 2670–2682.
26.Llisterri, J. (1995). “Relationships between speech production and speech perception in a second language,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, edited by K. Elenius and P. Branderud, Stockholm: KTH/Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 92–99.
27.Mack, M. (1989). “Consonant and vowel perception and production: Early English-French bilinguals and English monolinguals,” Percept. Psychophys. 46, 187–200.
28.Manuel, S. Y. (1999). “Cross-language studies: Relating language-particular patterns to other language-particular facts,” in Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques, edited by W. J. Hardcastle and N. Hewlett (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), pp. 179–198.
29.Miller, G. A. , Heise, G. A. , and Lichten, W. (1951). “The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials,” J. Exp. Psychol. 41, 329–335.
30.Norton, A. , Winner, E. , Cronin, K. , Overy, K. , Lee, D. J. , and Gottfried, S. (2005). “Are there pre-existing neural, cognitive, or motoric markers for musical ability?” Brain Cogn 59, 124–134.
32.Perception Research Systems, www.perceptionresearchsystems.com (Last viewed May, 2010).
34.Polka, L. , and Bohn, O. S. (1996). “A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 577–592.
35.Rochet, B. L. (1995). “Perception and production of second-language speech sounds by adults,” in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, edited by W. Strange (York, Timonium, MD), pp. 379–410.
36.Sheldon, A. , and Strange, W. (1982). “The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception,” Appl. Psycholinguist. 3, 243–261.
37.Stevens, K. N. (2002). “Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1872–1891.
38.Stevens, K. N. , Liberman, A. M. , Studdert-Kennedy, M. , and Öhman, S. (1969). “Cross-language study of vowel perception,” Lang Speech 12, 1–23.
39.Strange, W. , Bohn, O. -S. , Trent, S. A. , and Nishi, K. (2004). “Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1791–1807.
40.Strange, W. , Levy, E. S. , and Law, F. II (2009). “Cross-language categorization of French and German vowels by naïve American listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 1461–1476.
41.Strange, W. , and Shafer, V. L. (2008). “Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception,” in Phonology and Second Language Acquisition, edited by M. Zampini and J. Hansen (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
42.Strange, W. , Weber, A. , Levy, E. S. , Shafiro, V. , Hisagi, M. , and Nishi, K. (2007). “Acoustic variability within and across German, French and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1111–1129.
44.Zwicker, E. , and Terhardt, E. (1980). “Analytical expressions for critical-band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68, 1523–1525.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month