No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release
3.Chatterjee, M. (2003). “Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: Envelope versus tonotopic components,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2042–2053.
5.Cooke, M. , and Ellis, D. P. W. (2001). “The auditory organization of speech and other sources in listeners and computational models,” Speech Commun. 35, 141–177.
6.Dau, T. , Ewert, S. D. , and Oxenham, A. J. (2005). “Effects of concurrent and sequential streaming in comodulation masking release,” in Auditory Signal Processing: Physiology, Psychoacoustics, and Models, edited by D. Pressnitzer, A. de Cheveigné, S. McAdams, and L. Collet (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 335–343.
8.Eddins, D. A. , and Wright, B. A. , (1994). “Comodulation masking release for single and multiple rates of envelope fluctuation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 3432–3442.
9.Fantini, D. A. , Moore, B. C. J. , and Schooneveldt, G. P. (1993). “Comodulation masking release as a function of type of signal, gated or continuous masking, monaural or dichotic presentation of flanking bands, and center frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2106–2115.
10.Fastl, H. , and Zwicker, E. (2007). Psychoacoustics. Facts and Models (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), Chaps. 4, 6, 10, pp. 61–110, 149–174, 247–256.
11.Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725–1736.
13.Füllgrabe, C. , Berthommier, F. , and Lorenzi, C. (2006). “Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise,” Hear. Res. 211, 74–84.
16.Grose, J. H. , and Hall, J. W. III (1993). “Comodulation masking release: Is comodulation sufficient?,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2896–2902.
18.Haggard, M. P. , Hall, J. W. III, and Grose, J. H. (1990). “Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and test frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 113–118.
19.Hall, J. W. III, Grose, J. H. , and Haggard, M. P. (1990). “Effects of flanking band proximity, number, and modulation pattern on comodulation masking release,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 269–283.
20.Hall, J. W. , Haggard, M. P. , and Fernandes, M. A. (1984). “Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 50–56.
21.Hopkins, K. , and Moore, B. C. J. (2009). “The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 442–446.
22.Hopkins, K. , Moore, B. C. J. , and Stone, M. A. (2008). “Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 1140–1153.
23.Laneau, J. , Moonen, M. , and Wouters, J. (2006). “Factors affecting the use of noise-band vocoders as acoustic models for pitch perception in cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 491–506.
24.Langhans, A. , and Kohlrausch, A. (1992). “Differences in auditory performance between monaural and diotic conditions. I: Masked thresholds in frozen noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3456–3470.
26.Lorenzi, C. , Debruille, L. , Garnier, S. , Fleuriot, P. , and Moore, B. C. J. (2009). “Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 27–30.
27.Lorenzi, C. , Gilbert, G. , Carn, H. , Garnier, S. , and Moore, B. C. J. (2006). “Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 18866–18869.
28.McFadden, D. (1986). “Comodulation masking release: Effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 1658–1667.
29.Moore, B. (2008). “The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 9, 399–406.
30.Nelson, P. B. , Jin, S. -H. , Carney, A. E. , and Nelson, D. A. (2003). “Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 961–968.
31.Qin, M. K. , and Oxenham, A. J. (2003). “Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 446–454.
32.Recio-Spinoso, A. , Temchin, A. N. , van Dijk, P. , Fan, Y. -H. , and Ruggero, M. A. (2005). “Wiener-Kernel analysis of responses to noise of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers,” J Neurophysiol 93, 3615–3634.
34.Rosen, S. (1992). “Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, B, Biol. Sci. 336, 367–373.
35.Schooneveldt, G. P. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1987). “Comodulation masking release (CMR): Effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1944–1956.
36.Schooneveldt, G. P. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1989). “Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 273–281.
37.Shannon, R. V. , Zeng, F. -G. , Kamath, V. , Wygonski, J. , and Ekelid, M. (1995). “Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues,” Science 270, 303–304.
38.Stickney, G. S. , Zeng, F. -G. , Litovsky, R. , and Assmann, P. (2004). “Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1081–1091.
39.Verhey, J. L. , Dau, T. , and Kollmeier, B. (1999). “Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): Experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2733–2745.
41.Zeng, F. -G. , Nie, K. , Stickney, G. S. , Kong, Y. -Y. , Vongphoe, M. , Bhargave, A. , Wei, C. , and Cao, K. (2005). “Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 2293–2298.
42.Zwicker, E. (1952). “Die Grenzen der Hörbarkeit der Amplitudenmodulation und der Frequenzmodulation eines Tones” (“The limits of audibility for amplitude modulation and frequency modulation of a pure tone”), Acustica, Akust. Beihefte 3, AB125–AB133.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month