No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch
1. Y. Y. Kong and F. G. Zeng, “Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2830–2840 (2006).
2. G. Ehret and C. Schreiner, “Regional variations of noise-induced changes in operating range in cat AI,” Hear. Res. 141, 107–116 (2000).
3. B. Delgutte and N. Y. Kiang, “Speech coding in the auditory nerve: V. Vowels in background noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, 908–918 (1984).
4. A. Krishnan, Y. Xu, J. Gandour, and P. Cariani, “Human frequency-following response: Representation of pitch contours in Chinese tones,” Hear. Res. 189, 1–12 (2004).
5. N. Russo, T. Nicol, G. Musacchia, and N. Kraus, “Brainstem responses to speech syllables,” Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 2021–2030 (2004).
6. N. M. Russo, E. Skoe, B. Trommer, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, A. Bradlow, and N. Kraus, “Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders?,” Clin. Neurophysiol. 119, 1720–1731 (2008).
7. A. Parbery-Clark, E. Skoe, and N. Kraus, “Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound,” J. Neurosci. 29, 14100–14107 (2009).
8. S. Anderson, B. Chandrasekaran, E. Skoe, and N. Kraus, “Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise,” J. Neurosci. 30, 4922–4926 (2010).
9. J. Song, E. Skoe, K. Banai, and N. Kraus, “Perception of speech in noise: Neural correlates,” J. Cogn. Neurosci. In Press.
10.Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), “Occupational noise exposure: Hearing conservation amendment; final rule,” Fed. Regist. 46, 9738–9785 (1983).
11. I. Akhoun, S. Gallégo, A. Moulin, M. Ménard, E. Veuillet, C. Berger-Vachon, L. Collet, and H. Thai-Van, “The temporal relationship between speech auditory brainstem responses and the acoustic pattern of the phoneme /ba/ in normal-hearing adults,” Clin. Neurophysiol. 119, 922–933 (2008).
12. J. Hornickel, E. Skoe, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, and N. Kraus, “Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 13022–13027 (2009).
13. F. -C. Jeng, E. A. Schnabel, B. M. Dickman, J. Hu, X. Li, C. -D. Lin, and H. -K. Chung, “Early maturation of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in infants with normal hearing,” Percept. Mot. Skills 111, 765–784 (2010).
14. F. -C. Jeng, J. Hu, B. Dickman, C. Lin, C. Wang, H. Chung, and X. Li, “Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch,” Int. J. Audiol. In Press.
15. A. Krishnan, Y. Xu, J. Gandour, and P. Cariani, “Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience,” Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 161–168 (2005).
16. J. Cunningham, T. Nicol, C. King, S. G. Zecker, and N. Kraus, “Effects of noise and cue enhancement on neural responses to speech in auditory midbrain, thalamus and cortex,” Hear. Res. 169, 97–111 (2002).
17. A. Patel, Y. Xu, and B. Wang, “The role of F0 variation in the intelligibility of Mandarin sentences,” in Proceedings of the Speech Prosody, Chicago, IL (2010).
18. A. Krishnan, J. Gandour, G. Bidelman, and J. Swaminathan, “Experience dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem,” NeuroReport 20, 408–413 (2009).
19. A. Krishnan, J. Swaminathan, and J. T. Gandour, “Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context,” J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 1092–1105 (2009).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month