No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Dutch and English listeners’ interpretation of vowel duration
1. Adan, P. , Van Hout, R. , and Smits, R. (2004). “An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1729–1738.
2. Baayen, R. H. , Piepenbrock, R. , and Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. (Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).
, and Weenink
: Doing Phonetics by Computer, Version 5.1.32 available at http://www.praat.org/
(Last viewed July 30, 2010).
4. Booij, G. (1995). The Phonology of Dutch (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
5. Broersma, M. (2009). “Perception of final fricative voicing: Native and nonnative listeners’ use of vowel duration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 1636–1644.
6. Chomsky, N. , and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English (Harper and Row, New York).
8. Dietrich, C. , Swingley, D. , and Werker, J. F. (2007). “Native language governs interpretation of salient speech sound differences at 18 months,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 104, 454–464.
9. Haggard, M. (1978). “The devoicing of voiced fricatives,” J. Phonetics 6, 95–102.
10. Hillenbrand, J. M. , Getty, L. A. , Clark, M. J. , and Wheeler, K. (1995). “Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3099–3111.
11. Hillenbrand, J. M. , Clark, M. J. , and Houde, R. A. (2000). “Some effects of duration on vowel recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 3013–3022.
12. Hogan, J. T. , and Rozsypal, A. J. (1980). “Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 1764–1771.
14. Klatt, D. H. (1976). “Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 820–857.
15. Ko, E. , Soderstrom, M. , and Morgan, J. (2009). “Development of perceptual sensitivity to extrinsic vowel duration in infants learning American English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, EL135–EL139.
17. Nooteboom, S. G. , and Doodeman, G. J. N. (1980). “Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 276–287.
18. Raphael, L. J. (1972). “Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 1296–1303.
Article metrics loading...
Dutch and English listeners’ interpretation of vowel duration changes was examined in a word transcription task. Listeners were presented with spoken words realized with canonical or altered vowel durations. Dutch listeners often misperceived lengthened short vowels and shortened long vowels, identifying them as the short/long counterpart of the target, whereas English listeners more rarely misidentified words with altered vowel duration. Although Dutch and English are similar prosodically and phonologically, listeners’ treatment of vowel duration in clear speech is different across the two languages.
Full text loading...
Most read this month