1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Miniature photonic-crystal hydrophone optimized for ocean acoustics
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1121/1.3543949
/content/asa/journal/jasa/129/4/10.1121/1.3543949
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/129/4/10.1121/1.3543949

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Minimum acoustic noise in the sea (solid curve), with contributions from the acoustic background (dashed curve) and the thermal agitation of water molecules (dotted curve) (reproduced after Ref. 10, as adapted from Ref. 11). The markers denote the hearing threshold of killer whales (after Ref. 13) measured with behavioral responses (×) and auditory evoked potentials (+). The noise is in units of μPa/Hz1/2 (left axis), while the orca audiogram is in units of μPa (right axis).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Exploded view of the sensor structure showing (a) the silicon-based sensor chip, (b) the brass backchamber, and (c) the fiber bundle with four SMFs, each with a mirror at its tip.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

A cross-section of the sensor chip showing details of the channel structures and the three structural levels of the sensor chip. Scanning-electron micrographs of the three layers are included.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Diagram showing the steps of the sensor-chip fabrication.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The height profile through the center of a fabricated circular diaphragm, measured with an optical profilometer. The three-dimensional profile is shown as an inset.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Photograph of the packaged hydrophone.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Equivalent circuit formed by various lumped elements describing the sensor acoustics and the interfacing with optoelectronics. The circuit is superimposed upon a faded drawing of the sensor structure for reference. (The sensor drawing is not to scale.)

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

(a) Calculated response of sensor 1, (b) calculated noise spectrum (solid) showing contributions from radiation resistance (dashed), hole resistance (dotted), and channel resistance (dashed-dotted), and (c) calculated noise spectrum (solid) showing contributions from the noise coupling from sensors 2 (dashed) and 3 (dotted), and optoelectronic noise (dashed-dotted).

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

(a) Calculated MDP with Wenz’s minimum sea noise shown for reference, and (b) a better optimized MDP when the two parallel sensors are non-operational, so that crosstalk is reduced.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

(a) Linearity of sensor response with respect to diaphragm displacement, showing the normalized linearities of the diaphragm displacement (solid), FP response (dashed), and power coupled back into fiber (dotted). (b) THD with respect to the pressure amplitude for sensors 1 (solid), 2 (dashed), and 3 (dotted).

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Reynolds number at different frequencies for the annular channels of sensors 1 (solid), 2 (dashed), and 3 (dotted).

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Setup used to characterize the optical hydrophone (HO), showing: the DSA, the reference hydrophone (HR), the preamplifier of the reference hydrophone (A1), the AP, the power amplifier of the projector (A2), the water-filled tube (WT), the IS, the laser (L), the optical circulator (C), the PD, and the feedback between the reference-hydrophone output and the projector input (F).

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

(a) Measured average frequency response of the optical hydrophone (solid) and result for one measurement (dotted). (b) Measured average noise of the optical hydrophone (solid) and optoelectronic noise (dotted). (c) Measured average MDP of the optical hydrophone (solid), with the minimum sea noise included for reference (dashed).

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Measured coherence between the signals from the optical hydrophone and reference hydrophone (dashed), between the noise from the optical hydrophone and reference hydrophone (dotted), and between the noise from the reference reflector and reference hydrophone (solid).

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

Measured relative power spectrum of optical hydrophone for an acoustic wave at a constant frequency of 500 Hz and amplitude of 1.9 Pa, yielding a THD of −36 dB.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Structural dimensions of the optimized sensor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/129/4/10.1121/1.3543949
2011-04-08
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Miniature photonic-crystal hydrophone optimized for ocean acoustics
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/129/4/10.1121/1.3543949
10.1121/1.3543949
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM