No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Do male northern elephant seals recognize individuals or merely relative dominance rank?
3. Falls, J. B. (1982). “Individual recognition by sound in birds,” in Song Learning and Its Consequences, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Academic Press, New York), pp. 237–278.
4. Holt, M. M. , Southall, B. L. , Insley, S. J. , and Schusterman, R. J. (2010). “Call directionality and its behavioural significance in male northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris,” Anim. Behav. 80, 351–361.
5. Insley, S. J. (1992). “Mother-offspring separation and acoustic stereotypy: A comparison of call morphology in two species of pinnipeds,” Behaviour 120, 103–121.
6. Le Boeuf, B. J. (1974). “Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals,” Am. Zool. 14, 163–176.
8. McGregor, P. K. , Catchpole, C. K. , Dabelsteen, T. , Falls, J. B. , Fusani, L. , Gerhardt, H. C. , Gilbert, F. , Horn, A. G. , Klump, G. M. , Kroodsma, D. E. , Lambrechts, M. M. , McComb, K. E. , Nelson, D. A. , Pepperberg, I. M. , Ratcliffe, L. , Searcy, W. A. , and Weary, D. M. (1992). “Design of playback experiments: the Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW Consensus,” in Playback and Studies of Animal Communication, edited by P. K. McGregor (Plenum, New York), pp. 1–9.
9. Sandegren, F. E. (1976). “Agonistic behaviour in the male northern elephant seal,” Behaviour 57, 138–158.
11. Southall, B. L. (2002). “Northern elephant seal field bioacoustics and aerial auditory masked hearing in three pinnipeds,” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
Article metrics loading...
Vocal recognition was tested in a socially dynamic context where many individuals interact: the female defense polygyny practiced by male northern elephant seals. The goal was to tease apart whether animals recognize other individuals or instead use a simple rule-based category (i.e., relative dominance rank). A total of 67 playback experiments conducted with 18 males at Año Nuevo State Reserve, California, tested three aspects of recognition: (1) recognition of relative rank; (2) whether such recognition was continuous or categorical; and (3) recognition of familiarity. Results indicate that males recognize familiar individuals although responses are primarily based on relative dominance rank.
Full text loading...
Most read this month