d’ scores for tone-naïve (Australian English) and native (Mandarin) listeners across Auditory and Auditory-Visual modalities.
d’ scores for Australian English- and Mandarin-speaking perceivers in Auditory and Auditory-Visual conditions with unaltered audio, across the 6 tone pairs.
d’ scores for Australian English- and Mandarin-speaking perceivers in Auditory and Auditory-Visual conditions with cochlear implant simulation audio, across the 6 tone pairs.
Mean d’ scores for Australian English- and Mandarin- speakers in the Visual-Only condition.
Corpus of Mandarin syllables used in this experiment, grouped by tone pair, phonetic structure, and with pinyin romanization, phonetic transcriptions, English glosses, and frequency counts (appearances per million words of text).
Discrimination performance rankings, and d’ values, for tone pairs in Normal Audio (AO and AV combined), Cochlear Implant Audio Only (AO-CI), Cochlear Implant Audio-Visual (AV-CI) (with CI Visual Augmentation, i.e., AV-CI minus AO-CI, listed alongside) and Visual-Only conditions (VO).
Coefficients of acoustic predictors of “Change” responses in same and different AX trials across the 5 experimental modalities, separated by language background (Mandarin (M) and Australian English (AE). All are significant at the 0.05 level, with italics and boldface marking significance at the 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...