Important Notice Regarding Scitation Services

Scitation will be upgrading its access control system between July 4 and July 10, 2014. During this process, existing subscriptions and purchased content will remain available and unaffected, but some site and personal account functionality will be disabled.

Services will be fully restored on July 10, 2014. Thank you for your patience!

Click here for complete details.

1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
Comparing vowel perception and production in Spanish and Portuguese: European versus Latin American dialects
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/asa/journal/jasa/131/2/10.1121/1.3674991
1.
1. Adank, P. , Van Hout, R. , and Smits, R. (2004). “An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern standard Dutch,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 17291738.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1779271
2.
2. Assmann, P. F. , Nearey, T. M. , and Hogan, J. T. (1982). “Vowel identification: orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 97589.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.387579
3.
3. Barbosa, P. A. , and Albano, E. C. (2004). “Brazilian Portuguese,” J. Int. Phonet. Accos 34, 227232.
4.
4. Boersma, P. , and Chládková, K. (2011). “Asymmetries between speech perception and production reveal phonological structure,” Proceedings of the 17th ICPhS, pp. 328331.
5.
5. Boersma, P. , and Weenink, D. (2007). “PRAAT: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.30) [computer program],” http://www.praat.org/, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Last viewed April 1, 2007).
6.
6. Chládková, K. , Escudero, P. , and Boersma, P. (2011). “Context-specific acoustic differences between Peruvian and Iberian Spanish vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 416428.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3592242
7.
7. Costa, F. (2004). “Intrinsic prosodic properties of stressed vowels in European Portuguese,” Proceedings of Speech Prosody, pp. 5356.
8.
8. Cruz-Ferreira, M. (1995). “European Portuguese,” J. Int. Phonet. Assoc. 25, 9094.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300005223
9.
9. de Boer, B. (2011). “First formant difference for /i/ and /u/: A cross-linguistic study and an explanation,” J Phonetics 39, 110114.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.005
10.
10. Delgado-Martins, M. R. (1973). “Análise acústica das vogais orais tônicas em português (Acoustic analysis of the stressed oral vowels in Portuguese),” Boletim Filolog. (University of Lisbon) 22, 303314.
11.
11. Disner, S. F. (1983). “Vowel quality: The relation between universal and language specific factors,” Ph.D. thesis, UCLA, Los Angeles, available at http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1wm9n05g (Last viewed April 27, 2011).
12.
12. Escudero, P. , and Boersma, P. (2004). “Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory,” Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 26, 551585.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104040021
13.
13. Escudero, P. , Boersma, P. , Rauber, A. S. , and Bion, R. A. H. (2009). “A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 13791393.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3180321
14.
14. Evans, B. , and Iverson, P. (2007). “Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 38143826.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2722209
15.
15. Fox, R. A. (1982). “Individual Variation in the Perception of Vowels: Implications for a Perception-Production Link,” Phonetica 39, 122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000261647
16.
16. Martínez-Celdrán, E. , Fernández-Planas, A. M. , and Carrera-Sabaté, J. (2003). “Castilian Spanish,” J. Int. Phonet. Assoc. 33, 255259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025100303001373
17.
17. Mendoza, E. (2003). “Temporal variability in speech segments of Spanish: Context and speaker related differences,” Speech Commun. 40, 431447.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00086-9
18.
18. Nearey, T. M. (1989). “Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 20882113.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.397861
19.
19. Perkell, J. S. , Guenther, F. H. , Lane, H. , Matthies, M. L. , Stockman, E. , Tiede, M. , and Zandipour, M. (2004). “The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 23382344.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1787524
20.
20. Polka, L. , and Bohn, O. S. (1996). “A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 577592.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.415884
21.
21. Rauber, A. S. , Escudero, P. , Bion, R. A. H. , and Baptista, B. O. (2005). “The interrelation between the perception and production of English vowels by native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese,” Proceedings of Interspeech, Lisbon, pp. 29132916.
22.
22. Savela, J. (2009). “Role of selected spectral attributes in the perception of synthetic vowels,” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Turku, Turku.
23.
23. Stevens, K. N. (1969). “Crosslanguage study of vowel perception,” Lang. Speech 12, 123.
24.
24. Strange, W. , Bohn, O. S. , Trent, S. A. , and Nishi, K. (2004). “Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 17911807.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1687832
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/131/2/10.1121/1.3674991
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/131/2/10.1121/1.3674991
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/131/2/10.1121/1.3674991
2012-01-17
2014-07-10

Abstract

Recent acoustic descriptions have shown that Spanish and Portuguese vowels are produced differently in Europe and Latin America. The present study investigates whether comparable between-variety differences exist in vowel perception. Spanish, Peruvian, Portuguese, and Brazilian listeners were tested in a vowel identification task with stimuli sampled from the whole vowel space. The mean perceived first (F1) and second formant (F2) of every vowel category were compared across varieties. For both languages, perception exhibited the same between-variety differences as production for F1 but not F2, which suggests correspondence between produced F1 and perceived vowel height but not between F2 and frontness.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/131/2/1.3674991.html;jsessionid=2md7hkkgp60d2.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/131/2/10.1121/1.3674991&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Scitation|Comparing vowel perception and production in Spanish and Portuguese: European versus Latin American dialects
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/131/2/10.1121/1.3674991
10.1121/1.3674991
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM