1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A vessel noise budget for Admiralty Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington (USA)
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1121/1.4763548
/content/asa/journal/jasa/132/6/10.1121/1.4763548
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/132/6/10.1121/1.4763548

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(Color online) (a) The Salish Sea with the study area highlighted. (b) Admiralty Inlet bathymetry and deployment site (closed circle) with extent of ship tracking (white outline). (c). Ship tracks from January 1 to January 15, 2011. Gray lines are local ferry traffic and black lines are all other vessel traffic.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(Color online) Ship traffic density map plotted on a 100 m × 100 m horizontal grid. Each subplot represents an area with the dimensions of 28 km by 40 km. In the passenger vessel density subplot, grid points located under the ferry traffic route are saturated to avoid obscuring the traffic patterns of other passenger vessels such as high-speed ferries.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Sample acoustic data from February 12, 2011. The time series are constructed from 10 s recordings every minute. (a) Spectrogram showing regular increases in energy content over all frequencies due to vessel traffic. (b) Time series of one-third octave band SPLs with center frequencies from 16 Hz to 25 kHz. (c) Time series of broadband SPLs (0.02–30 kHz).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(Color online) Cumulative probability distribution function of unweighted broadband SPLs (0.02–30 kHz) and M-weighted cumulative probability distribution functions for pinnipeds in water (Mpw) and low- (Mlf), mid- (Mmf), and high-frequency (Mhf) cetacean marine mammal functional hearing groups.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(Color online) Hourly (a), daily (b), and monthly (c) average broadband (0.02–30 kHz) and M-weighted SPLs. The box plots show the range for the 25%–75% thresholds and the whiskers show the range for the 5%–95% thresholds for broadband SPLs. The mean, minimum, and maximum sample sizes () are included for the statistics in each subplot. February and August sample sizes were significantly below the mean due to extended AIS receiver outages and data gaps from bottom-package recovery/redeployment.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

(Color online) (a) Percentile calculations of pressure spectral density for unweighted received levels. (b) Percentiles for unweighted received levels in one-third octave band SPLs. The received broadband SPLs associated with the percentage thresholds are 107.3 dB (5%), 113.4 dB (25%), 119.2 dB (50%), 124.5 dB (75%), and 132.3 dB (95%).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(Color online) (a) Acoustic spectra for a cargo ship at 1.5 km, the local ferry at 1.0 km, and a tug at 1.2 km, and the fifth percentile spectrum. (b) One-third octave band SPLs for the respective spectra in (a).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Cumulative probability distributions of ambient noise (0.02–30 kHz) in the study area for measurements (all ambient noise sources) and the model for vessel noise. The gray envelope of modeled noise represents predicted received levels using transmission loss coefficients from 15 to 16.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

(Color online) (a) Site map and profile locations used for the range dependent PE model. A typical ship track for southbound traffic is included (white line). (b)–(f). Transmission losses modeled at 50, 100, and 250 Hz and a comparison with the simplified model. For P1, the missing points are associated parts of the profile where the receiver depth of 57 m was below the water–sediment interface. The transmission loss is plotted every 100 m to reduce the clutter associated with the modal interference patterns. Each transmission loss plot ends at the location of the hydrophone deployment.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Received levels (0.02–30 kHz) from local ferry traffic versus the distance between the ferry and the hydrophone.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Merged frequency bands.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Ship traffic summary, including the total number of vessels, the total number of vessel hours spent in the study area, average speed over ground, and average length overall by vessel class and type. SOG and LOA values include the standard deviations.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Vessel name, type, LOA, SOG, and CPA for events highlighted in Fig. 3.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Estimated source levels (0.02–30 kHz) based on received levels (0.02–30 kHz) for selected ships.

Generic image for table
TABLE V.

Vessel noise budget calculated by Eq. (3).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/132/6/10.1121/1.4763548
2012-12-06
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A vessel noise budget for Admiralty Inlet, Puget Sound, Washington (USA)
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/132/6/10.1121/1.4763548
10.1121/1.4763548
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM