1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
The vowel inherent spectral change of English vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/asa/journal/jasa/133/5/10.1121/1.4798620
1.
1. T. M. Nearey and P. F. Assmann, “Modeling the role of vowel inherent spectral change in vowel identification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 12971308 (1986).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.394433
2.
2. J. M. Hillenbrand, M. J. Clark, and T. M. Nearey, “Effects of consonant environment on vowel recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 748763 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1337959
3.
3. G. E. Peterson and L. H. Barney, “Control methods used in a study of the vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24, 175184 (1952).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1906875
4.
4. J. M. Hillenbrand and T. M. Neary, “Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: Effects of formant contour,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 35093523 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.424676
5.
5. J. E. Flege, O. S. Bohn, and S. Jang, “Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels,” J. Phonetics 25, 437470 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
6.
6. P. F. Assmann and W. F. Katz, “Synthesis fidelity and time-varying spectral change in vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 886895 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1852549
7.
7. B. Yang, “A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers,” J. Phonetics 24, 245261 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0013
8.
8. G. Jia., D. Aaronson, and Y. H. Wu, “Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive factors and language group differences,” Appl. Psycholing. 23, 599621 (2002).
9.
9. C. Liu and S.-H. Jin, “Intelligibility of American English vowels of native and non-native speakers in quiet and speech-shaped noise,” Bilingualism: Lang. Cognit. 16, 206218 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S136672891200051X
10.
10. S-H. Jin, C. Liu, and S. Kamdar, “Acoustic features and intelligibility of American-English vowels for English, Chinese, and Korean talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2727 (2009).
11.
11. S. Y. Manuel and R. A. Krakow, “Universal and language particular aspects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation,” Haskins Lab. Status Report on Speech Research. Available at http://www.haskins.yale.edu/sr/SR077/SR077_06.pdf (Last viewed 3/25/2013).
12.
12. S. Y. Manuel, “The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 12861298 (2012).
13.
13. C. Meunier, C. Frenck-Mestre, T. Lelekov-Boissard, and M. Le Besnerais, “Production and perception of foreign vowels: Does the density of the system play a role?” in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (2003), pp. 723726.
14.
14. C. Liu, S. Tao, W. Wang, and Q. Dong, “Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, EL189195 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4742318
15.
15. J. M. Howie, Acoustical Studies of Mandarin Vowels and Tones, edited by J. M. Howie (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1976), Chap. III, pp. 147200.
16.
16. J. M. Hillenbrand, L. A. Getty, M. J. Clark, and K. Weeler, “Acoustic characteristics of American English Vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 30993111 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.411872
17.
17. ANSI S3.6-2010: Specification for Audiometers (Acoustical Society of America, New York, 2010).
18.
18. H. Traunmuller, “Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 97100 (1990).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.399849
19.
19. G. S. Morrison and T. M. Nearey, “Testing theories of vowel inherent spectral change,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, EL15EL22 (2007).
20.
20. D. B. Fry, The Physics of Speech (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1979), pp. 7181.
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/133/5/10.1121/1.4798620
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/133/5/10.1121/1.4798620
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/133/5/10.1121/1.4798620
2013-04-08
2014-11-21

Abstract

The current study examined Vowel Inherent Spectral Change (VISC) of English vowels spoken by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers. Two metrics, spectral distance (amount of spectral shift) and spectral angle (direction of spectral shift) of formant movement from the onset to the offset, were measured for 12 English monophthongs produced in a /hvd/ context. While Chinese speakers showed significantly greater spectral distances of vowels than English and Korean speakers, there was no significant speakers' native language effect on spectral angles. Comparisons to their native vowels for Chinese and Korean speakers suggest that VISC might be affected by language-specific phonological structure.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/133/5/1.4798620.html;jsessionid=3dmfagocwm5u8.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/133/5/10.1121/1.4798620&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: The vowel inherent spectral change of English vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/133/5/10.1121/1.4798620
10.1121/1.4798620
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM