No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
The vowel inherent spectral change of English vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers
1. T. M. Nearey and P. F. Assmann, “Modeling the role of vowel inherent spectral change in vowel identification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 1297–1308 (1986).
2. J. M. Hillenbrand, M. J. Clark, and T. M. Nearey, “Effects of consonant environment on vowel recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 748–763 (2001).
4. J. M. Hillenbrand and T. M. Neary, “Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: Effects of formant contour,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3509–3523 (1999).
5. J. E. Flege, O. S. Bohn, and S. Jang, “Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels,” J. Phonetics 25, 437–470 (1997).
6. P. F. Assmann and W. F. Katz, “Synthesis fidelity and time-varying spectral change in vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 886–895 (2005).
8. G. Jia., D. Aaronson, and Y. H. Wu, “Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive factors and language group differences,” Appl. Psycholing. 23, 599–621 (2002).
9. C. Liu and S.-H. Jin, “Intelligibility of American English vowels of native and non-native speakers in quiet and speech-shaped noise,” Bilingualism: Lang. Cognit. 16, 206–218 (2013).
10. S-H. Jin, C. Liu, and S. Kamdar, “Acoustic features and intelligibility of American-English vowels for English, Chinese, and Korean talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2727 (2009).
11. S. Y. Manuel
and R. A. Krakow
, “Universal and language particular aspects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation
,” Haskins Lab. Status Report on Speech Research. Available at http://www.haskins.yale.edu/sr/SR077/SR077_06.pdf
(Last viewed 3/25/2013).
12. S. Y. Manuel, “The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1286–1298 (2012).
13. C. Meunier, C. Frenck-Mestre, T. Lelekov-Boissard, and M. Le Besnerais, “Production and perception of foreign vowels: Does the density of the system play a role?” in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (2003), pp. 723–726.
14. C. Liu, S. Tao, W. Wang, and Q. Dong, “Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, EL189–195 (2012).
15. J. M. Howie, Acoustical Studies of Mandarin Vowels and Tones, edited by J. M. Howie (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1976), Chap. III, pp. 147–200.
16. J. M. Hillenbrand, L. A. Getty, M. J. Clark, and K. Weeler, “Acoustic characteristics of American English Vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3099–3111 (1995).
17. ANSI S3.6-2010: Specification for Audiometers (Acoustical Society of America, New York, 2010).
19. G. S. Morrison and T. M. Nearey, “Testing theories of vowel inherent spectral change,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, EL15–EL22 (2007).
20. D. B. Fry, The Physics of Speech (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1979), pp. 71–81.
Article metrics loading...
The current study examined Vowel Inherent Spectral Change (VISC) of English vowels spoken by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers. Two metrics, spectral distance (amount of spectral shift) and spectral angle (direction of spectral shift) of formant movement from the onset to the offset, were measured for 12 English monophthongs produced in a /hvd/ context. While Chinese speakers showed significantly greater spectral distances of vowels than English and Korean speakers, there was no significant speakers' native language effect on spectral angles. Comparisons to their native vowels for Chinese and Korean speakers suggest that VISC might be affected by language-specific phonological structure.
Full text loading...
Most read this month