1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Misperceptions of spoken words: Data from a random sample of American English words
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1121/1.4809540
/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/1/10.1121/1.4809540
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/1/10.1121/1.4809540

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Frequency distribution of the edit distance of incorrect responses relative to the target word as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (left panel) and of number of syllables in the target word (right panel).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Frequency distribution of the number of phonemes in incorrect responses minus the number of phonemes in the corresponding target response as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (left panel) and of number of syllables in the target word (right panel).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Frequency distribution of the number of syllables in incorrect responses minus the number of syllables in the corresponding target responses as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (left panel) and of number of syllables in the target word (right panel).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Frequency distribution of the log frequency of occurrence in error responses minus the log frequency of occurrence in the corresponding target responses as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (left panel) and of number of syllables in the target word (right panel). See the text for an explanation of how log frequency of occurrence was calculated. In the left panel, the distributions lie virtually on top of one another, making it extremely difficult to see the individual curves for the different S/N ratios.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Frequency distribution of the edit distance of incorrect responses relative to the target word for words (left panel) and non-words (right panel) as a function of number of syllables in the target word.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Frequency distribution of the number of phonemes in incorrect responses minus the number of phonemes in the target word for words (left panel) and non-words (right panel) as a function of number of syllables in the target word.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Frequency distribution of the number of syllables in incorrect responses minus the number of syllables in the target word for words (left panel) and non-words (right panel) as a function of number of syllables in the target word.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Percent of responses in each error category.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Mean normalized edit distance between responses and targets and mean normalized difference in the number of phonemes in responses and targets as a function of the number of phonemes in the target word.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Mean normalized edit distance between responses and targets and mean normalized difference in the number of phonemes in responses and targets as a function of the number of syllables in the target word.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Monte-Carlo simulation results for the mean difference in the number of phonemes, in the number of syllables, and in the log frequency of occurrence of errors and targets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/1/10.1121/1.4809540
2013-07-01
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Misperceptions of spoken words: Data from a random sample of American English words
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/1/10.1121/1.4809540
10.1121/1.4809540
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM