No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Passive estimation of the waveguide invariant per pair of modes
1. F. B. Jensen, W. A. Kuperman, M. B. Porter, and H. Schmidt, Computational Ocean Acoustics, 2nd edition (Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2011), Chaps. 2 and 5, pp. 133–139, 337–360, 440–442.
2. S. D. Chuprov, “ Interference structure of a sound field in a layered ocean,” Ocean Acoustics, Modern State (Nauka, Moscow, 1982), pp. 71–91.
3. K. L. Cockrell and H. Schmidt, “ Robust passive range estimation using the waveguide invariant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2780–2789 (2010).
4. R. Goldhahn, G. Hickman, and J. Krolik, “ Waveguide invariant broadband target detection and reverberation estimation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 2841–2851 (2008).
6. W. S. Hodgkiss, H. C. Song, W. A. Kuperman, T. Akal, C. Ferla, and D. R. Jackson, “ A long-range and variable focus phase-conjugation experiment in shallow water,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1597–1604 (1999).
8. D. Rouseff and R. C. Spindel, “ Modeling the waveguide invariant as a distribution,” AIP Conf. Proc. 621, 137–148 (2002).
9. L. A. Brooks, M. R. F. Kidner, A. C. Zander, C. H. Hansen, and Z. Y. Zhang, “ Techniques for extraction of the waveguide invariant from interference patterns in spectrograms,” in Proceedings of Acoustics, New Zealand (2006), pp. 445–452.
10. D. Rouseff and L. M. Zurk, “ Striation-based beam forming for estimating the waveguide invariant with passive sonar,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130(2 ), EL76–EL81 (2011).
11. S. Zhou, H. Niu, Y. Ren, and L. He, “ Fluctuating modal interference characteristics in shallow water with a seasonal thermocline,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1495, 321–328 (2012).
12. E. C. Shang, J. R. Wu, and Z. D. Zhao, “ Relating waveguide invariant and bottom reflection phase-shift parameter P in a Pekeris waveguide,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 3691–3697 (2012).
13.Automatic Identification System, mandatory for most ships.
14. C. Gervaise, B. G. Kinda, J. Bonnel, Y. Stéphan, and S. Vallez, “ Passive geoacoustic inversion with a single hydrophone using broadband ship noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131(3 ), 1999–2010 (2012).
15. K. L. Cockrell and H. Schmidt, “ A relationship between the waveguide invariant and wavenumber integration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128(1 ), EL63–EL68 (2010).
17.The quantity is linked to , which is without interest in our context.
18. J. Serra. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology (Academic Press, London, 1982).
Article metrics loading...
In many oceanic waveguides, acoustic propagation is characterized by a parameter called waveguide invariant. This property is used in many passive and active sonar applications where knowledge of the waveguide invariant value is required. The waveguide invariant is classically considered as scalar but several studies show that it is better modeled by a distribution because of its dependence on frequency and mode pairs. This paper presents a new method for estimating the waveguide invariant distribution. Using the noise radiated by a distant ship and a single hydrophone, the proposed methodology allows estimating the waveguide invariant for each pair of modes in shallow water. Performance is evaluated on simulated data.
Full text loading...
Most read this month