No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Estimation of source range using horizontal multipath in continental shelf environments
1. R. Doolittle, A. Tolstoy, and M. J. Buckingham, “Experimental confirmation of horizontal refraction from a point source in a wedge-shaped ocean,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 2117–2125 (1988).
2. K. D. Heaney, W. A. Kuperman, and B. E. McDonald, “Perth-Burmuda sound propagation (1960): Adabatic mode interpretation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 2586–2594 (1991).
3. K. D. Heaney and J. J. Murray, “Measurement of three-dimensional propagation in a continental shelf environment,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 1394–1402 (2009).
4. M. S. Ballard, “Modeling three-dimensional propagation in a continental shelf environment,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 1969–1977 (2012).
5. H. P. Bucker, “Use of calculated sound field and matched field detection to locate sound sources in shallow water,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 368–373 (1976).
6. A. B. Baggeroer, W. A. Kuperman, and H. Schmidt, “Matched field processing: Source localization in correlated noise as an optimum parameter estimation problem,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 571–587 (1988).
9. M. Bono, B. Shapo, P. McCarty, and R. Bethel, “Subband energy detection in passive array processing,” in The 9th Adaptive Sensor Array Processing (ASAP) Workshop (2001), pp. 25–30.
Article metrics loading...
A method to estimate source range in environments that exhibit three-dimensional propagation effects is presented. A hybrid modeling technique using vertical modes and horizontal rays is employed. Results are obtained in a computationally efficient manner and require limited knowledge of the environment. The method is applied to data recorded on a horizontal line array located 12 km east of the southern coast of Florida. The results show an average error of 3.7% in estimating the range of an acoustic source located 20 to 63 km away from the array.
Full text loading...
Most read this month