No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners
1. ANSI (1987). S3.39 (R2012), American National Standard Specifications for Instruments to Measure Aural Acoustic Impedance and Admittance (Aural Acoustic Immittance) (Acoustical Society of America, New York).
2. ANSI (2004). S3.21 (R2009), American National Standard Methods for Manual Pure-Tone Threshold Audiometry (Acoustical Society of America, New York).
4. Apoux, F. , and Healy, E. W. (2009). “ On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: Further evidence for auditory channel independence,” Hear. Res. 255, 99–108.
5. Apoux, F. , and Healy, E. W. (2010). “ Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 2075–2084.
6. Bacon, S. P. , Fay, R. R. , and Popper, A. N. (2004). Compression: From Cochlea to Cochlear Implants (Springer, New York), pp. 136–152.
7. Bacon, S. P. , and Gleitman, R. M. (1992). “ Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 642–653.
8. Bacon, S. P. , Opie, J. M. , and Montoya, D. Y. (1998). “ The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 41, 549–563.
9. Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1993). “ Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 1229–1241.
10. Bernstein, J. G. W. , and Grant, K. W. (2009). “ Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3358–3372.
11. Brungart, D. S. , Chang, P. S. , Simpson, B. D. , and Wang, D. (2006). “ Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 4007–4018.
12. Cao, S. , Li, L. , and Wu, X. (2011). “ Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 2227–2236.
13. Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “ Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725–1736.
14. Fink, N. , Furst, M. , and Muchnik, C. (2012). “ Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 1718–1731.
15. Fitzgibbons, P. L. , and Wightman, F. L. (1982). “ Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 761–765.
16. Garofolo, J. S. , Lamel, L. F. , Fisher, W. M. , Fiscus, J. G. , Pallett, D. S. , and Dahlgren, N. L. (1993). “ DARPA TIMIT acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus,” technical report No. NISTIR4930, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
17. Glasberg, B. R. , Moore, B. C. J. , and Bacon, S. P. (1987). “ Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81, 1546–1556.
18. Grant, K. W. , Tufts, J. B. , and Greenberg, S. (2007). “ Integration efficiency for speech perception within and across sensory modalities by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 1164–1176.
20. Han, K. , and Wang, D. L. (2013). “ Towards generalizing classification based speech separation,” IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 21, 166–175.
21. Healy, E. W. , and Bacon, S. P. (2002). “ Across-frequency comparison of temporal speech information by listeners with normal and impaired hearing,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 45, 1262–1275.
27. Hu, G. , and Wang, D. L. (2001). “ Speech segregation based on pitch tracking and amplitude modulation” in Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, pp. 79–82.
25. Hu, Y. , and Loizou, P. C. (2007). “ A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1777–1786.
26. Hu, Y. , and Loizou, P. C. (2010). “ Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 3689–3695.
28. IEEE (1969). “ IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 17, 225–246.
29. Kim, C. , and Stern, R. M. (2008). “ Robust signal-to-noise ratio estimation based on waveform amplitude distribution analysis,” in Proceedings of INTERSPEECH, pp. 2598–2601.
30. Kim, G. , Lu, Y. , Hu, Y. , and Loizou, P. C. (2009). “ An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 1486–1494.
31. Levitt, H. (1997). “ NEW TRENDS: Digital hearing aids: Past, present, and future,” Guest Editorial in Practical Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting, edited by H. Tobin (VA-Rehabilitation R&D Service, Washington DC), pp. xi–xxiii.
32. Levitt, H. (2001). “ Noise reduction in hearing aids: A review,” J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 38, 111–121.
33. Li, N. , and Loizou, P. C. (2008). “ Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: Implications for noise reduction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 1673–1682.
35. Loizou, P. C. (2007). Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), Chap. 5–8.
36. Lorenzi, C. , Gilbert, G. , Carn, H. , Garnier, S. , and Moore, B. C. J. (2006). “ Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 18866–18869.
37. Moore, B. C. J. (2007). Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Chichester), pp. 45–91.
38. Moore, B. C. J. , Shailer, M. J. , and Schooneveldt, G. P. (1992). “ Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss,” Br. J. Audiol. 26, 229–237.
40. Nelson, P. B. , and Thomas, S. D. (1997). “ Gap detection as a function of stimulus loudness for listeners with and without hearing loss,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40, 1387–1394.
41. Nilsson, M. , Soli, S. D. , and Sullivan, J. A. (1994). “ Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1085–1099.
43. ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1992). “ Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception I,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2872–2880.
44. ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1993). “ Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception II,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 1547–1552.
45. Turner, C. W. , Chi, S.-L. , and Flock, S. (1999). “ Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 42, 773–784.
47. Wang, D. , and Brown, G. (2006). Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles, Algorithms and Applications (Wiley-IEEE, Hoboken, NJ), pp. 1–44.
49. Wang, D. , Kjems, U. , Pedersen, M. , Boldt, J. , and Tunner, T. (2009). “ Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2336–2347.
46. Wang, D. L. (2005). “ On ideal binary mask as the computational goal of auditory scene analysis,” in Speech Separation by Humans and Machines, edited by P. Divenyi (Kluwer, Norwell, MA), pp. 181–197.
48. Wang, Y. , Han, K. , and Wang, D. (2013). “ Exploring monaural features for classification-based speech segregation,” IEEE Trans. Audio. Speech Lang. Process. 21, 270–279.
51. Wilson, R. H. , and Carhart, R. (1969). “ Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 998–1010.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month