1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
Calibrating passive acoustic monitoring: Correcting humpback whale call detections for site-specific and time-dependent environmental characteristics
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/5/10.1121/1.4822319
1.
1. T. Marques, L. Thomas, J. Ward, N. DiMarzio, and P. Tyack, “ Estimating cetacean population density using fixed passive acoustic sensors: An example with Blainville's beaked whales,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 19821994 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3089590
2.
2. T. Helble, G. D'Spain, J. Hildebrand, G. Campbell, R. Campbell, and K. Heaney, “ Site specific probability of passive acoustic detection of humpback whale calls from single fixed hydrophones,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 25562570 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4816581
3.
3. S. Wiggins, “ Autonomous Acoustic Recording Packages (ARPs) for long-term monitoring of whale sounds,” Marine Technol. Soc. J. 37, 1322 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.4031/002533203787537375
4.
4. R. Payne and S. McVay, “ Songs of humpback whales,” Science 173, 585597 (1971).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3997.585
5.
5.Digital Coast: NOAA Coastal Services Center, “ 2009–2010 commercial vessel density (October - AIS),” 2013, available at URL http://www.marinecadastre.gov/ (Last viewed 7/11/2013).
6.
6. M. McKenna, S. Katz, S. Wiggins, D. Ross, and J. Hildebrand, “ A quieting ocean: Unintended consequence of a fluctuating economy,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, EL169EL175 (2012).
7.
7. M. McKenna, M. Soldevilla, E. Oleson, S. Wiggins, and J. Hildebrand, “ Increased underwater noise levels in the Santa Barbara Channel from commercial ship traffic and its potential impact on Blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus),” in Proceedings of the Seventh California Islands Symposium, edited by C. C. Damiani and D. K. Garcelon (Institute for Wildlife Studies, Arcata, CA, 2009), pp. 141149.
8.
8. M. Collins, User's Guide for RAM Versions 1.0 and 1.0p (Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 2002), available at URL http://www.siplab.fct.ualg.pt/models/ram/manual.pdf (Last viewed 03/02/2013).
9.
9. T. Helble, G. Ierley, G. D'Spain, M. Roch, and J. Hildebrand, “ A generalized power-law detection algorithm for humpback whale vocalizations,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 26822699 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3685790
10.
10. R. Andrew, B. Howe, J. Mercer, and M. Dzieciuch, “ Ocean ambient sound: Comparing the 1960s with the 1990s for a receiver off the California coast,” ARLO 3, 6570 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1461915
11.
11. D. Ross, “ On ocean underwater ambient noise,” Inst. Acoust. Bull. 18, 58 (1993).
12.
12. R. Andrew, B. Howe, and J. Mercer, “ Long-time trends in ship traffic noise for four sites off the North American West Coast,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 642651 (2012).
13.
13. G. Wenz, “ Review of underwater acoustics research: Noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 10101024 (1972).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1912921
14.
14. P. Kaluza, A. Kölzsch, M. Gastner, and B. Blasius, “ The complex network of global cargo ship movements,” J. R. Soc., Interface 7, 10931103 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0495
15.
15. K. Matveev, “ Effect of drag-reducing air lubrication on underwater noise radiation from ship hulls,” J. Vibr. Acoust. 127, 420422 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1924646
16.
16. P. Arveson and D. Vendittis, “ Radiated noise characteristics of a modern cargo ship,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 118129 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.428344
17.
17. M. McKenna, D. Ross, S. Wiggins, and J. Hildebrand, “ Underwater radiated noise from modern commercial ships,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 92103 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3664100
18.
18. V. Knudsen, R. Alford, and J. Emling, “ Underwater ambient noise,” J. Mar. Res. 7, 410429 (1948).
19.
19. G. Wenz, “ Acoustic ambient noise in the ocean: Spectra and sources,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 19361956 (1962).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1909155
20.
20. National Research Council, Ocean Noise and Marine Mammals (National Academies, Washington, DC, 2003), pp. 83132.
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/5/10.1121/1.4822319
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/5/10.1121/1.4822319
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/5/10.1121/1.4822319
2013-10-10
2014-11-29

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the importance of accounting for environmental effects on passive underwater acoustic monitoring results. The situation considered is the reduction in shipping off the California coast between 2008–2010 due to the recession and environmental legislation. The resulting variations in ocean noise change the probability of detecting marine mammal vocalizations. An acoustic model was used to calculate the time-varying probability of detecting humpback whale vocalizations under best-guess environmental conditions and varying noise. The uncorrected call counts suggest a diel pattern and an increase in calling over a two-year period; the corrected call counts show minimal evidence of these features.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/134/5/1.4822319.html;jsessionid=1jb9d8ppowfm.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/5/10.1121/1.4822319&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Calibrating passive acoustic monitoring: Correcting humpback whale call detections for site-specific and time-dependent environmental characteristics
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/5/10.1121/1.4822319
10.1121/1.4822319
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM