No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech
1. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , and Bolker, B. (2012). “lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes” [computer program].
2. Bradlow, A. R. , and Alexander, J. A. (2007). “ Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and nonnative listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121(4), 2339–2349.
5. Devos, T. , and Banaji, M. R. (2005). “ American = White?,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88(3), 447–466.
8. Grant, K. W. , and Seitz, P. F. (2000). “ The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108(3), 1197–1208.
9. Hardison, D. (2003). “ Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability,” Appl. Psycholinguist. 24(4), 495–522.
12. Irwin, A. , Pilling, M. , and Thomas, S. M. (2011). “ An analysis of British regional accent and contextual cue effects on speechreading performance,” Speech Commun. 53(6), 807–817.
15. Minear, M. , and Park, D. C. (2004). “ A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli,” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36(4), 630–633.
16. Smiljanic, R. , and Bradlow, A. R. (2011). “ Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency nonnative talkers and listeners: Intelligibility and accentedness,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130(6), 4020–4031.
17. Sommers, M. S. , Tye-Murray, N. , and Spehar, B. (2005). “ Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults,” Ear Hear. 26, 263–275.
18. Sumby, W. H. , and Pollack, I. (1954). “ Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 26(2), 212–215.
19. Van Engen, K. J. , Baese-Berk, M. , Baker, R. E. , Choi, A. , Kim, M. , and Bradlow, A. R. (2010). “ The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles,” Lang. Speech.53, 510–540.
Article metrics loading...
The role of visual cues in native listeners' perception of speech produced by nonnative speakers has not been extensively studied. Native perception of English sentences produced by native English and Korean speakers in audio-only and audiovisual conditions was examined. Korean speakers were rated as more accented in audiovisual than in the audio-only condition. Visual cues enhanced word intelligibility for native English speech but less so for Korean-accented speech. Reduced intelligibility of Korean-accented audiovisual speech was associated with implicit visual biases, suggesting that listener-related factors partially influence the efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech perception.
Full text loading...
Most read this month