No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Improved estimation of frequency importance functions
1. ANSI (1997). ANSI S3.5. American National Standard for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index (Acoustical Society of America, Melville, NY).
4. French, N. R. , and Steinberg, J. C. (1947). “ Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 90–119.
5. Lagarias, J. C. , Reeds, J. A. , Wright, M. H. , and Wright, P. E. (1998). “ Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions,” SIAM J. Optim. 9, 112–147.
6. Marchand, P. , and Marmet, L. (1983). “ Binomial smoothing filter: A way to avoid some pitfalls of least square polynomial smoothing,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 54, 1034–1041.
7. Studebaker, G. A. , and Sherbecoe, R. L. (1991). “ Frequency-importance and transfer functions for recorded CID W-22 word lists,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 34, 427–438.
8. Studebaker, G. A. , and Sherbecoe, R. L. (1993). “ Frequency-importance functions for speech recognition,” in Acoustic Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, edited by G. A. Studebaker and I. Hochberg (Allyn and Bacon, Boston), pp. 185–204.
9. Wong, L. N. N. , Ho, A. H. S. , Chua, E. W. W. , and Soli, S. D. (2007). “ Development of the Cantonese speech intelligibility index,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 2350–2361.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month