No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Human response to vibration in residential environments
1.ANC (2001). Association of Noise Consultants Guidelines: Measurement and Assessment of Groundborne Noise and Vibration (ANC guidelines), Fresco, pp. 1–173.
2. Arnberg, P. W. , Bennerhult, O. , and Eberhardt, J. L. (1990). “Sleep disturbances caused by vibrations from heavy road traffic,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1486–1493.
3. Bellmann, M. A. (2002). “Perception of whole-body vibrations: From basic experiments to effects of seat and steering-wheel vibrations on the passenger's comfort inside vehicles,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Oldenburg, Germany.
4. Berry, B. F. , and Flindell, I. H. (2009). “Estimating dose-response relationships between noise exposure and human health impacts in the UK,” Defra (London).
5. Brink, M. , and Wunderli, J.-M. (2010). “A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2301–2311.
6. Brown, A. , and Van Kamp, I. (2009). “Response to a change in transport noise exposure: A review of evidence of a change effect,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3018–3029.
8.BS 6472-1:2008 (2008). Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings. Vibration sources other than blasting (British Standards Institution, London).
9.BS 6841:1987 (1987). Guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock (British Standards Institution, London).
10.BS EN ISO 8041:2005 (2005). Human response to vibration. Measuring instrumentation (British Standards Institution, London).
11. Condie, J. , Steele, A. , Whittle, N. , Brown, P. , and Waddington, D. (2011). “Human response to vibration in residential environments (NANR209),” Technical Report 2: Measurement of Response, University of Salford, Defra, London.
13. Fidell, S. , Pearsons, K. , Silvati, L. , and Sneddon, M. (2002). “Relationship between low-frequency aircraft noise and annoyance due to rattle and vibration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1743–1750.
12. Fidell, S. , Silvati, L. , and Pearsons, K. (1999). “Field study of the annoyance of low-frequency runway sideline noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 1408–1415.
14. Fields, J. M. (1993). “Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2753–2763.
15. Fields, J. M. , de Jong, R. G. , Gjestland, T. , Flindell, I. H. , Job, R. F. S. , Kurra, S. , Lercher, P. , Vallet, M. , Guski, R. , Felscher-Suhr, U. , and Schuemer, R. (2001). “Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation,” J. Sound Vib. 242, 641–679.
17. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A. , Ögren, M. , Jerson, T. , and Öhrström, E. (2012). “Railway noise annoyance and the importance of number of trains, ground vibration, and building situational factors,” Noise Health, 14, 190–201.
17. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G. , and Miedema, H. (2006). “Multilevel grouped regression for analyzing self-reported health in relation to environmental factors: the model and its application,” Biomet. J. 48, 67–82.
19. Howarth, H. , and Griffin, M. (1988). “The frequency dependence of subjective reaction to vertical and horizontal whole-body vibration at low magnitudes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1406–1413.
20.ISO 2631-1:1997. (1997). Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 1: General requirements (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
21.ISO 2631-2:2003. (2003). Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 2: Vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz) (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
22.ISO/TS 15666:2003. (2003). Acoustics. Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
23. Job, R. (1988). “Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 991–1001.
25. Klæboe, R. , Öhrström, E. , Turunen-Rise, I. , Bendtsen, H. , and Nykanen, H. (2003a). “Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic–Part III: Towards a common methodology for socio-vibrational surveys,” Appl. Acoust. 64, 111–120.
26. Klæboe, R. , Turunen-Rise, I. , Hårvik, L. , and Madshus, C. (2003b). “Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic–Part II: Exposure-effect relationships based on ordinal logit and logistic regression models,” Appl. Acoust. 64, 89–109.
27. Miedema, H. , and Oudshoorn, C. G. (2001). “Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals,” Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 409–416.
28. Miedema, H. , and Vos, H. (1998). “Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3432–3445.
29. Miedema, H. , and Vos, H. (1999). “Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3336–3344.
30. Morioka, M. , and Griffin, M. J. (2006). “Magnitude-dependence of equivalent comfort contours for fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical hand-transmitted vibration,” J. Sound Vib. 295, 633–648.
30.NT ACOU 106 (2001). “Acoustics: Assessment of annoyance caused by vibrations in dwellings from road and rail traffic by means of socio- vibrational and social surveys,” Nordtest, Finland.
31. Ögren, M. , and Öhrström, E. (2009). “Effects of railway noise and vibrations on sleep—experimental studies within the Swedish research program TVANE,” in Proceedings of Euronoise, pp. 1214–1221.
32. Peris, E. , Woodcock, J. , Sica, G. , Sharp, C. , Moorhouse, A. T. , and Waddington, D. C. (2014). “Effect of situational, attitudinal and demographic factors on railway vibration annoyance in residential areas,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 194–204.
34. Schomer, P. , Mestre, V. , Fidell, S. , Berry, B. , Gjestland, T. , Vallet, M. , and Reid, T. (2012). “Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of the annoyance of road and rail noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 2772–2786.
35. Schomer, P. D. , and Neathammer, R. D. (1987). “The role of helicopter noise-induced vibration and rattle in human response,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81, 966–976.
36. Sharp, C. , Woodcock, J. , Sica, G. , Peris, E. , Moorhouse, A. T. , and Waddington, D. C. (2014). “Developing exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to freight and passenger railway vibration exposure in residential environments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 205–212.
37. Sica, G. , Peris, E. , Woodcock, J. S. , Moorhouse, A. T. , and Waddington, D. C. (2013). “Design of measurement methodology for the evaluation of human exposure to vibration in residential environments,” Sci. Total Environ. (in press).
38.TRL, Temple, ISVR, and Arup Acoustics (2007). NANR172 Human response to vibration in residential environments, Defra, London.
40. Woodruff, H. J. , and Griffin, M. J. (1987). “A survey of the effect of railway-induced building vibration on the community,” Institute of Sound and Vibration Research Technical Report, UK.
41. Woods, R. (1997). “Dynamic effects of pile installations on adjacent structures,” NCHRP 253, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (Transportation Research Board), pp. 8–9.
42. Zapfe, J. A. , Saurenman, H. , and Fidell, S. (2009). “Ground-borne noise and vibration in buildings caused by rail transit,” TCRP Project D-12.
Article metrics loading...
This paper presents the main findings of a field survey conducted in the United Kingdom into the human response to vibration in residential environments. The main aim of this study was to derive exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to vibration from environmental sources. The sources of vibration considered in this paper are railway and construction activity. Annoyance data were collected using questionnaires conducted face-to-face with residents in their own homes. Questionnaires were completed with residents exposed to railway induced vibration (N = 931) and vibration from the construction of a light rail system (N = 350). Measurements of vibration were conducted at internal and external positions from which estimates of 24-h vibration exposure were derived for 1073 of the case studies. Sixty different vibration exposure descriptors along with 6 different frequency weightings were assessed as potential predictors of annoyance. Of the exposure descriptors considered, none were found to be a better predictor of annoyance than any other. However, use of relevant frequency weightings was found to improve correlation between vibration exposure and annoyance. A unified exposure-response relationship could not be derived due to differences in response to the two sources so separate relationships are presented for each source.
Full text loading...
Most read this month