Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. M. Siderius, C. H. Harrison, and M. B. Porter, “ A passive fathometer technique for imaging seabed layering using ambient noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 13151323 (2006).
2. C. H. Harrison and D. G. Simons, “ Geoacoustic inversion of ambient noise: A simple method,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 13771389 (2002).
3. D. L. Donoho, “ Compressed sensing,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 12891306 (2006).
4. E. J. Candès, J. Romberg, and T. Tao, “ Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 489509 (2006).
5. M. Lustig, D. Donoho, and J. M. Pauly, “ Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging,” Magn. Reson. Med. 58, 11821195 (2007).
6. R. G. Baraniuk, E. Candes, M. Elad, and Y. Ma, “ Applications of sparse representation and compressive sensing,” Proc. IEEE 98, 906909 (2010).
7. M. Elad, Sparse and Redundant Representations (Springer, New York, 2010), pp. 1376.
8. H. Yao, P. Gerstoft, P. M. Shearer, and C. F. Mecklenbräuker, “ Compressive sensing of the Tohoku–Oki Mw 9.0 earthquake: Frequency-dependent rupture modes,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L20310, doi:10.1029/2011GL049223 (2011).
9. N. R. Chapman and I. Barrodale, “ Deconvolution of marine seismic data using the ℓ1 norm,” Geophys. J. Int. 72, 93100 (1983).
10. F. Fazel, M. Fazel, and M. Stojanovic, “ Random access compressed sensing for energy- efficient underwater sensor networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 29, 16601670 (2011).
11. W. U. Bajwa, J. Haupt, A. M. Sayeed, and R. Nowak, “ Compressed channel sensing: A new approach to estimating sparse multipath channels,” Proc. IEEE 98, 10581076 (2010).
12. C. R. Berger, S. Zhou, J. C. Preisig, and P. Willett, “ Sparse channel estimation for multicarrier underwater acoustic communication: From subspace methods to compressed sensing,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 58, 17081721 (2010).
13. G. F. Edelmann and C. F. Gaumond, “ Beamforming using compressive sensing,” J Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, EL232EL237 (2011).
14. W. Mantzel, J. Romberg, and K. Sabra, “ Compressive matched-field processing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 90102 (2012).
15. D. Malioutov, M. Çetin, and A. S. Willsky, “ A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 53, 30103022 (2005).
16. E. J. Candès and M. B. Wakin, “ An introduction to compressive sampling,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25, 2130 (2008).
17. C. H. Harrison and M. Siderius, “ Bottom profiling by correlating beam-steered noise sequences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 12821296 (2008).
18. P. Gerstoft, W. S. Hodgkiss, M. Siderius, C.-F. Huang, and C. H. Harrison, “ Passive fathometer processing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 12971305 (2008).
19. M. Siderius, H. Song, P. Gerstoft, W. S. Hodgkiss, P. Hursky, and C. Harrison, “ Adaptive passive fathometer processing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 21932200 (2010).
20. J. Traer, P. Gerstoft, and W. S. Hodgkiss, “ Ocean bottom profiling with ambient noise: A model for the passive fathometer,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 18251836 (2011).
21. Z.-H. Michalopoulou, C. Yardim, and P. Gerstoft, “ Particle filtering for passive fathometer tracking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, EL74EL80 (2012).
22. C. H. Harrison, “ Sub-bottom profiling using ocean ambient noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 15051515 (2004).
23. M. Siderius and C. Harrison, “ High-frequency geoacoustic inversion of ambient noise data using short arrays,” AIP Conf. Proc. 728, 2231 (2004).
24. J. I. Arvelo, Jr., “ Robustness and constraints of ambient noise inversion,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 679686 (2008).
25. J. E. Quijano, S. E. Dosso, J. Dettmer, L. M. Zurk, M. Siderius, and C. H. Harrison, “ Bayesian geoacoustic inversion using wind-driven ambient noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 26582667 (2012).
26. J. E. Quijano, S. E. Dosso, J. Dettmer, L. M. Zurk, and M. Siderius, “ Trans-dimensional geoacoustic inversion of wind-driven ambient noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, EL47EL53 (2012).
27. R. G. Baraniuk, “ Compressive sensing,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 24, 118121 (2007).
28. H. Monajemi, S. Jafarpour, M. Gavish, Stat 330/CME 362 Collaboration, and D. L. Donoho, “ Deterministic matrices matching the compressed sensing phase transitions of Gaussian random matrices,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 11811186 (2013).
29. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004), pp. 1701.
30. W. A. Kuperman and F. Ingenito, “ Spatial correlation of surface generated noise in a stratified ocean,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 19881996 (1980).
31. J. Traer and P. Gerstoft, “ Coherent averaging of the passive fathometer response using short correlation time,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 36333641 (2011).
32. M. Grant, S. Boyd, and Y. Ye, CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, (Last viewed October 1, 2013).
33. N. M. Carbone, G. B. Deane, and M. J. Buckingham, “ Estimating the compressional and shear wave speeds of a shallow water seabed from the vertical coherence of ambient noise in the water column,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 801813 (1998).
34. L. Muzi, M. Siderius, J. Gebbie, and J. Paddock, “ On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise,” in Proceedings of the IEEE OCEANS Conference (Seattle, WA, 2010), pp. 16.
35. H. Schmidt, OASES: Version 3.1, user guide and reference manual, (Last viewed October 1, 2013).
36. C. H. Harrison, “ Formulas for ambient noise level and coherence,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 20552066 (1996).
37. C. F. Mecklenbrauker, P. Gerstoft, A. Panahi, and M. Viberg, “ Sequential Bayesian sparse source reconstruction using array data,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 61, 63446354 (2013).
38. C. W. Holland, “ Mapping seabed variability: Rapid surveying of coastal regions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 13731387 (2006).
39. C. W. Holland, P. L. Nielsen, J. Dettmer, and S. Dosso, “ Resolving meso–scale seabed variability using reflection measurements from an autonomous underwater vehicle,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 10661078 (2012).
40. C. W. Holland, “ Coupled scattering and reflection measurements in shallow water,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 27, 454470 (2002).
41. C. W. Holland, R. C. Gauss, P. C. Hines, P. Nielsen, J. R. Preston, C. H. Harrison, D. D. Ellis, K. D. LePage, J. Osler, R. W. Nero, D. Hutt, and A. Turgut, “ Boundary characterization experiment series overview,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 30, 784806 (2005).
42. A. Turgut, “ Inversion of bottom/sub-bottom statistical parameters from acoustic backscatter data,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 833852 (1997).
43. J. R. Preston, D. D. Ellis, and R. C. Gauss, “ Geoacoustic parameter extraction using reverberation data from the 2000 Boundary Characterization Experiment on the Malta Plateau,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 30, 709732 (2005).
44. M. R. Fallat, P. L. Nielsen, S. E. Dosso, and M. Siderius, “ Geoacoustic characterization of a range-dependent ocean environment using towed array data,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 30, 198206 (2005).
45. J. Dettmer, S. E. Dosso, and C. W. Holland, “ Model selection and Bayesian inference for high-resolution seabed reflection inversion,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 706716 (2009).
46. P. L. Nielsen and C. Harrison, “ Combined geoacoustic inversion of propagation and reverberation data,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 34, 5162 (2009).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Surface generated ambient noise can be used to infer sediment properties. Here, a passive geoacoustic inversion method that uses noise recorded by a drifting vertical array is adopted. The array is steered using beamforming to compute the noise arriving at the array from various directions. This information is used in two different ways: Coherently (cross-correlation of upward/downward propagating noise using a minimum variance distortionless response fathometer), and incoherently (bottom loss vs frequency and angle using a conventional beamformer) to obtain the bottom properties. Compressive sensing is used to invert for the number of sediment layer interfaces and their depths using coherent passive fathometry. Then the incoherent bottom loss estimate is used to refine the sediment thickness, sound speed, density, and attenuation values. Compressive sensing fathometry enables automatic determination of the number of interfaces. It also tightens the sediment thickness priors for the incoherent bottom loss inversion which reduces the search space. The method is demonstrated on drifting array data collected during the Boundary 2003 experiment.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd