Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. Chung, K. (2004). “Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids: Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms,” Trends Amplif. 8, 83124.
2. Chung, K. (2012). “Wind noise in hearing aids: II. Effects of microphone directionality,” Int. J. Audiol. 51, 2942.
3. Chung, K. , and McKibben, N. (2011). “Microphone directionality, pre-emphasis filter, and wind noise in cochlear implants,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 22, 586600.
4. Chung, K. , Zeng F.-G. , and Acker, K. N. (2006). “Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 22162227.
5. Dillon, H. , Roe, I. , and Katsch, R. (1999). “Wind noise in hearing aids,” presented at Hearing Aid Amplification for the New Millennium, Sydney, Australia. It may be viewed at http://www. noise.ppt (Last viewed November 8, 2013).
6. IEEE (1969). “IEEE recommended practice speech quality measurements,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU17, 225246.
7. Kates, J. M. (2008). Digital Hearing Aids (Plural Publishing, Plymouth, UK), pp. 147173.
8. Spriet, A. , Van Deun. L. , Eftaxiadis, K. , Laneau, J. , Moonen, M. , Van Dijk, B. , Van Wieringen, A. , and Wouters, J. (2007). “Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system,” Ear Hear. 28, 6272.
9. Thompson, S. C. (2002). “Microphone, telecoil, and receiver options: Past, present, and future,” in Hearing Aids: Standards, Options, and Limitations, edited by M. Valente (Thieme Medical Publishers, New York), pp. 64100.
11. Zakis, J. A. (2011). “Wind noise at microphones within and across hearing aids at wind speeds below and above microphone saturation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 38973907.

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Behind-the-ear (BTE) processors of cochlear implant (CI) devices offer little to almost no protection from wind noise in most incidence angles. To assess speech intelligibility, eight CI recipients were tested in 3 and 9 m/s wind. Results indicated that speech intelligibility decreased substantially when the wind velocity, and in turn the wind sound pressure level, increased. A two-microphone wind noise suppression strategy was developed. Scores obtained with this strategy indicated substantial gains in speech intelligibility over other conventional noise reduction strategies tested.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd