Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. A. Bendixen, E. Schroger, and I. Winkler, “ I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system,” J. Neurosci. 29, 84478451 (2009).
2. G. Rohenkohl, A. M. Cravo, V. Wyart, and A. C. Nobre, “ Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory information,” J. Neurosci. 32, 84248428 (2012).
3. R. P. Rao and D. H. Ballard, “ Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects,” Nature Neurosci. 2, 7987 (1999).
4. A. M. Cravo, G. Rohenkohl, V. Wyart, and A. C. Nobre, “ Temporal expectation enhances contrast sensitivity by phase entrainment of low-frequency oscillations in visual cortex,” J. Neurosci. 33, 40024010 (2013).
5. V. J. Walter and W. G. Walter, “ The central effects of periodic sensory stimulation,” Electroencephalography Clin. Neurophysiol. 1, 5786 (1949).
6. C. E. Schroeder and P. Lakatos, “ Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection,” Trends Neurosci. 32, 918 (2009).
7. P. Lakatos, “ An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex,” J. Neurophysiol. 94, 19041911 (2005).
8. P. Lakatos, G. Karmos, A. D. Mehta, I. Ulbert, and C. E. Schroeder, “ Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection,” Science 320, 110113 (2008).
9. B. S. W. Ng, N. K. Logothetis, and C. Kayser, “ EEG phase patterns reflect the selectivity of neural firing,” Cerebral Cortex 23, 389398 (2013).
10. A.-L. Giraud and D. Poeppel, “ Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations,” Nat. Neurosci. 15, 511517 (2012).
11. M. J. Henry and B. A. Herrmann, “ Precluding role of low-frequency oscillations for auditory perception in a continuous processing mode,” J. Neurosci. 32, 1752517527 (2012).
12. M. R. Jones and M. Boltz, “ Dynamic attending and responses to time,” Psychol. Rev. 96, 459491 (1989).
13. M. R. Jones, “ Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory,” Psychol. Rev. 83, 323355 (1976).
14. C. Drake, M. R. Jones, and C. Baruch, “ The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: Attunement, referent period, focal attending,” Cognition 77, 251288 (2000).
15. M. R. Jones, H. Moynihan, N. MacKenzie, and J. Puente, “ Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays,” Psychol. Sci. 13, 313319 (2002).
16. J. M. Klein and M. R. Jones, “ Effects of attentional set and rhythmic complexity on attending,” Perception Psychophys. 58, 3446 (1996).
17. R. Barnes and M. R. Jones, “ Expectancy, attention, and time,” Cognit. Psychol. 41, 254311 (2000).
18. J. D. McAuley and M. R. Jones, “ Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: A comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing,” J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perf. 29, 11021125 (2003).
19. J. Rimmele, H. Jolsvai, and E. Sussman, “ Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations,” J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 11361147 (2011).
20. M. Schmidt-Kassow, R. I. Schubotz, and S. A. Kotz, “ Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability,” Neuroreport 20, 3136 (2009).
21. G. Stefanics, B. Hangya, I. Hernadi, I. Winkler, P. Lakatos, and I. Ulbert, “ Phase entrainment of human delta oscillations can mediate the effects of expectation on reaction speed,” J. Neurosci. 30, 1357813585 (2010).
22. B. S. W. Ng, T. Schroeder, and C. A. Kayser, “ Precluding but not ensuring role of entrained low-frequency oscillations for auditory perception,” J. Neurosci. 32, 1226812276 (2012).
23. M. J. Henry and J. Obleser, “ Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 2009520100 (2012).
24. B. Zoefel and P. Heil, “ Detection of near-threshold sounds is independent of EEG phase in common frequency bands,” Front. Psychol. 4(262) (2013).
25. W. M. Hartmann, Signals, Sound and Sensation (Springer, New York, 1998).
26. C. Kaernbach, “ Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data,” Percept. Psychophys. 63, 13891398 (2001).
27. K. E. Mathewson, M. Fabiani, G. Gratton, D. M. Beck, and A. Lleras, “ Rescuing stimuli from invisibility: Inducing a momentary release from visual masking with pretarget entrainment,” Cognition 115, 186191 (2010).
28. E. M. Zion Golumbic, N. Ding, S. Bickel, P. Lakatos, C. A. Schevon, G. M. McKhann, R. R. Goodman, R. Emerson, A. D. Mehta, J. Z. Simon, D. Poeppel, and C. E. Schroeder, “ Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a ‘cocktail party,’ ” Neuron 77, 980991 (2013).
29. S. Nozaradan, I. Peretz, and A. Mouraux, “ Selective neuronal entrainment to the beat and meter embedded in a musical rhythm,” J. Neurosci. 32, 1757217581 (2012).
30. D. Poeppel, “ The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as ‘asymmetric sampling in time,’ ” Speech Commun. 41, 245255 (2003).
31. T. Neuling, S. Rach, S. Wagner, C. H. Wolters, and C. S. Herrmann, “ Good vibrations: Oscillatory phase shapes perception,” NeuroImage 63, 771778 (2012).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Periodic stimuli are common in natural environments and are ecologically relevant, for example, footsteps and vocalizations. This study reports a detectability enhancement for temporally cued, periodic sequences. Target noise bursts (embedded in background noise) arriving at the time points which followed on from an introductory, periodic “cue” sequence were more easily detected (by ∼1.5 dB SNR) than identical noise bursts which randomly deviated from the cued temporal pattern. Temporal predictability and corresponding neuronal “entrainment” have been widely theorized to underlie important processes in auditory scene analysis and to confer perceptual advantage. This is the first study in the auditory domain to clearly demonstrate a perceptual enhancement of temporally predictable, near-threshold stimuli.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd