1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
Comparison between parallel transfer matrix method and admittance sum method
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/2/10.1121/1.4885481
1.
1. C. Zwikker and C. Kosten, Sound Absorbing Materials (Elsevier, New York, 1949), p. 161.
2.
2. K. S. Sum, J. Pan, and S. Z. Peng, “ Use of parallel microperforated panel subabsorbers for noise control in ducts,” in Proceedings of 13th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Vienna, Austria (July 2–6 2006), pp. 18.
3.
3. J.-P. Groby, B. Brouard, O. Dazel, B. Nennig, and L. Kelders, “ Enhancing rigid frame porous layer absorption with three-dimensional periodic irregularities,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 821831 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4773276
4.
4. K. Verdière, R. Panneton, S. Elkoun, T. Dupont, and P. Leclaire, “ Transfer matrix method applied to the parallel assembly of sound absorbing materials,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 46484658 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4824839
5.
5. J. F. Allard and N. Atalla, Propagation of Sound in Porous Media: Modeling Sound Absorbing Materials, 2nd ed. (Elsevier Applied Science, New York, 2009), pp. 243307.
6.
6.ASTM E1050-12: Standard Test Method for Impedance and Absorption of Acoustical Materials Using a Tube, Two Microphones and a Digital Frequency Analysis System (American Society for Testing and Materials, New York, 2012).
7.
7. T. Dupont, P. Leclaire, R. Panneton, K. Verdière, and S. Elkoun, “ A method for measuring the acoustic properties of a porous sample mounted in a rigid ring in acoustic tubes,” POMA 19, 065008 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4805193
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/2/10.1121/1.4885481
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/2/10.1121/1.4885481
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/2/10.1121/1.4885481
2014-07-11
2014-09-18

Abstract

A transfer matrix method to predict absorption coefficient and transmission loss of parallel assemblies of materials which can be expressed by a 2 × 2 transfer matrix was published recently. However, the usual method based on the sum of admittances is largely used to predict also surface admittance of parallel assemblies. This paper aims to highlight differences between both methods through three examples on a parallel assembly backed by (1) a rigid wall, (2) an air cavity, and (3) an anechoic termination.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/136/2/1.4885481.html;jsessionid=71pmtul2en2u.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/2/10.1121/1.4885481&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Comparison between parallel transfer matrix method and admittance sum method
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/2/10.1121/1.4885481
10.1121/1.4885481
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM