No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Motion of a rigid prolate spheroid in a sound wave field
2. T. B. Gabrielson, D. L. Gardner, and S. L. Garrett, “ A simple neutrally buoyant sensor for direct measurement of particle velocity and intensity in water,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97(4), 2227–2237 (1995).
3. C. Flammer, Spheroidal Wave Functions ( Dover, Mineola, NY, 2005).
6. J. E. Boisvert and A. L. Van Buren, “ Acoustic radiation impedance of rectangular pistons on prolate spheroids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111(2), 867–874 (2002).
7. J. P. Barton, N. L. Wolff, H. Zhang, and C. Tarawneh, “ Near-field calculations for a rigid spheroid with an arbitrary incident acoustic field,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113(3), 1216–1222 (2003).
9. B. Balachandran and E. B. Magrab, Vibrations, 2nd ed. ( Cengage Learning, Toronto, 2009), pp. 1–67.
Article metrics loading...
The motions of a rigid and unconstrained prolate spheroid subjected to plane sound waves are computed using preliminary analytic derivation and numerical approach. The acoustically induced motions are found comprising torsional motion as well as translational motion in the case of acoustic oblique incidence and present great relevance to the sound wavelength, body geometry, and density. The relationship between the motions and acoustic particle velocity is obtained through finite element simulation in terms of sound wavelengths much longer than the overall size of the prolate spheroid. The results are relevant to the design of inertial acoustic particle velocity sensors based on prolate spheroids.
Full text loading...
Most read this month