Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/4/10.1121/1.4893331
1.
1. Bashford, J. A. , Warren, R. M. , and Brown, C. A. (1996). “ Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong ‘bottom-up’ cues for phonemic restoration,” Percept. Psychophys. 58, 342350.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206810
2.
2. Doelling, K. B. , Arnal, L. H. , Ghitza, O. , and Poeppel, D. (2014). “ Acoustic landmarks drive delta–theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing,” Neuroimage 85, 761768.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.035
3.
3. Obleser, J. , Herrmann, B. , and Henry, M. J. (2012). “ Neural oscillations in speech: Don't be enslaved by the envelope,” Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00250
4.
4. Rosen, S. M. (1992). “ Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory, and linguistic aspects,” Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London B 336, 367373.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1992.0070
5.
5. Samuel, A. G. (1987). “ Lexical uniqueness effects on phonemic restoration,” J. Mem. Lang. 26, 3656.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90061-1
6.
6. Schroeder, M. R. (1968). “ Reference signal for signal quality studies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 17351736.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1911323
7.
7. Shannon, R. V. , Zeng, F. , Kamath, V. , Wygonski, J. , and Ekelid, M. (1995). “ Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues,” Science 270, 303304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5234.303
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/4/10.1121/1.4893331
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/4/10.1121/1.4893331
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/4/10.1121/1.4893331
2014-09-11
2016-09-27

Abstract

Abstract: Prior studies exploring the contribution of amplitude envelope information to spoken word recognition are mixed with regard to the question of whether amplitude envelope alone, without spectral detail, can aid isolated word recognition. Three experiments show that the amplitude envelope will aid word identification only if two conditions are met: (1) It is not the only information available to the listener and (2) lexical ambiguity is not present. Implications for lexical processing are discussed.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/136/4/1.4893331.html;jsessionid=9sQlOh3gEb85Fa1PGvmeQatX.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/4/10.1121/1.4893331&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/136/4/10.1121/1.4893331&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/136/4/10.1121/1.4893331'
Right1,Right2,Right3,