Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. J. C. Middlebrooks and D. M. Green, “ Sound localization by human listeners,” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 42, 135159 (1991).
2. E. A. G. Shaw, “ Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56, 18481861 (1974).
3. W. A. Yost and R. H. Dye, “ Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 18461851 (1988).
4. E. R. Hafter, R. H. Dye, J. M. Neutzel, and H. Aronow, “ Difference thresholds for interaural intensity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 829834 (1977).
5. J. P. Mäkelä and L. McEvoy, “ Auditory evoked fields to illusory sound source movements,” Exp. Brain Res. 110, 446454 (1996).
6. H. C. Hart, A. R. Palmer, and D. A. Hall, “ Different areas of human non-primary auditory cortex are activated by sounds with spatial and nonspatial properties,” Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 178190 (2004).
7. N. H. Salminen, P. J. May, P. Alku, and H. Tiitinen, “ A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex,” PLoS One 4, e7600 (2009).
8. G. C. Stecker, I. A. Harrington, and J. C. Middlebrooks, “ Location coding by opponent neural populations in the auditory cortex,” PLoS Biol. 3, e78 (2005).
9. D. S. Brungart and W. M. Rabinowitz, “ Auditory localization of nearby sources. Head-related transfer functions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 14651479 (1999).
10. L. R. Bernstein and C. Trahiotis, “ Lateralization produced by interaural intensitive disparities appears to be larger for high-vs low-frequency stimuli,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, EL15EL20 (2011).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Interaural level difference (ILD) is used as a cue in horizontal sound source localization. In free field, the magnitude of ILD depends on frequency: it is more prominent at high than low frequencies. Here, a magnetoencephalography experiment was conducted to test whether the sensitivity of the human auditory cortex to ILD is also frequency-dependent. Robust cortical sensitivity to ILD was found that could not be explained by monaural level effects, but this sensitivity did not differ between low- and high-frequency stimuli. This is consistent with previous psychoacoustical investigations showing that performance in ILD discrimination is not dependent on frequency.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd