Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/4/10.1121/1.4916792
1.
1. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. , and Walker, S. (2014). “ lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4,” R package version 1.1-7, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
2.
2. Cole, R. A. , Jakimik, J. , and Cooper, W. E. (1978). “ Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64(1), 4456.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.381955
3.
3. Connine, C. , Blasko, D. , and Titone, D. (1993). “ Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition?,” J. Mem. Language 32, 193210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1011
4.
4. Ernestus, M. , and Mak, W. M. (2004). “ Distinctive phonological features differ in relevance for both spoken and written word recognition,” Brain Language 90(1–3), 378392.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00449-8
5.
5. Fromkin, V. (1971). “ The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances,” Language 47(1), 2752.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412187
6.
6. Hockett, C. (1967). The Quantification of Functional Load: A Linguistic Problem, U.S. Air Force Memorandum RM-5168-PR.
7.
7. Miller, G. , and Nicely, P. (1955). “ An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27(2), 338352.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907526
8.
8. New, B. , Pallier, C. , Ferrand, L. , and Matos, R. (2001). “ Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE” (“A lexical database from the French Contemporary online: GLOSSARY”), Ann. Psychol. 101, 447462.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/psy.2001.1341
9.
9. Samuel, A. G. , and Lieblich, J. (2014). “ Visual speech acts differently than lexical context in supporting speech perception,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40(4), 14791490.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036656
10.
10. Stemberger, J. P. (1991). “ Apparent anti-frequency effects in language production: The addition bias and phonological underspecification,” J. Mem. Language 30, 161185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90002-2
11.
11. Studdert-Kennedy, M. , Shankweiler, D. , and Pisoni, D. B. (1972). “ Auditory and phonetic processes in speech perception: Evidence from a dichotic study,” Cognit. Psychol. 3(3), 455466.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90017-5
12.
12. Sumby, W. H. , and Pollack, I. (1954). “ Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 26, 212215.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907309
13.
13. Surendran, D. , and Niyogi, P. (2003). Measuring the Usefulness (Functional Load) of Phonological Contrasts, Department of Computer Science at the University of Chicago, Technical Report No. TR-2003.
14.
14. Wedel, A. , Kaplan, A. , and Jackson, S. (2013). “ High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study,” Cognition 128(2), 179186.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/4/10.1121/1.4916792
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/4/10.1121/1.4916792
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/4/10.1121/1.4916792
2015-04-06
2016-12-06

Abstract

French listeners' reliance on voicing, manner, and place was tested in a mispronunciation detection task. Mispronounced words were more likely to be recognized when the mispronunciation concerned voicing rather than manner or place. This indicates that listeners rely less on the former than on the latter for the purposes of word recognition. Further, the role of visual cues to phonetic features was explored by the task being conducted in both an audio-only and an audiovisual version, but no effect of modality was found. Discussion focuses on crosslinguistic comparisons and lexical factors that might influence the weight of individual features.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/137/4/1.4916792.html;jsessionid=DmvVeDW5hhkwii9DFmoGrT1Q.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/4/10.1121/1.4916792&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/137/4/10.1121/1.4916792&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/4/10.1121/1.4916792'
Right1,Right2,Right3,