Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4919701
1.
1. Berg, B. (1990). “ Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 149158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.399962
2.
2. Gilbertson, L. , and Lutfi, R. A. (2014). “ Correlations of decision weights and cognitive function for the masked discrimination of vowels by young and old adults,” Hear. Res. 317, 914.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.001
3.
3. Hawks, J. W. , and Miller, J. D. (1995). “ A formant bandwidth estimation procedure for vowel synthesis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 13431344.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.412986
4.
4. Helfer, K. , and Freyman, R. (2008). “ Aging and speech-on-speech masking,” Ear Hear. 29, 8798.
5.
5. Helfer, K. , and Wilber, L. (1988). “ Speech understanding and aging,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 859893.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.395965
6.
6. Huang, Y. , Xu, L. , Wu, X. , and Li, L. (2010). “ The effect of voice cuing on releasing speech from informational masking disappears in older adults,” Ear Hear. 31, 579583.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181db6dc2
7.
7. Humes, L. , Watson, B. , Christensen, L. , Cokely, C. , Halling, D. , and Lee, L. (1994). “ Factors associated with individual differences in clincal measures of speech recognition among the elderly,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 37, 465474.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3702.465
8.
8. Klatt, D. H. , and Klatt L. C. (1990). “ Analysis, synthesis and perception of voice quality variations among male and female talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 820856.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.398894
9.
9. Lutfi, R. A. , and Liu, C. (2011). “ Target enhancement and noise cancellation in the identification of a rudimentary sound source in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, EL52EL56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3533000
10.
10. Nearey, T. M. (1989). “ Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 20882113.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.397861
11.
11. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003). “ Cognitive aging and auditory information processing,” Int. J. Audiol. 42, 2632.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074641
12.
12. Russo, F. , and Pichora-Fuller, M. (2008). “ Tune in or tune out: Age-related differences in listening to speech in music,” Ear Hear. 29, 746760.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31817bdd1f
13.
13. Schneider, B. A. , Daneman, M. , and Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2002). “ Listening in aging adults: From discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics,” Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 56(3), 139152.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087392
14.
14. Stewart, R. , and Wingfield, A. (2009). “ Hearing loss and cognitive effort in older adults’ report accuracy for verbal materials,” J. Am. Acad. Aud. 20, 147154.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.20.2.7
15.
16. Tun, P. , and Wingfield, A. (1999). “ One voice too many: Adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds,” J. Gerontol. Psychol. Sci. 54B, 317327.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.5.P317
16.
15. Tun, P. A. , O’Kane, G. , and Wingfield, A. (2002). “ Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners,” Psychol. Aging 17(3), 453467.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.453
17.
17. Van Rooij, J. C. G. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “ Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 26112624.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.399981
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4919701
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4919701
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4919701
2015-05-22
2016-09-26

Abstract

Gilbertson and Lutfi [(2014). Hear. Res. , 9–14] report that older adults perform similarly to younger adults on a masked vowel discrimination task when the fundamental frequency (F0) of target and masker vowel differ but that the older adults perform more poorly when the F0 is the same. This paper presents an alternative analysis of those data to support the conclusion that the poorer performance of older adults is due to an increase in the decision weight on masker reflecting poorer selective attention in noise of older adults.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/1.4919701.html;jsessionid=qckqyF6-Gf5MCGNdI7wVXM8i.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4919701&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4919701&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4919701'
Right1,Right2,Right3,