Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921340
1.
1. Cai, W. , and Shalaev, V. M. (2010). Optical Metamaterials ( Springer, Berlin).
2.
2. Craster, R. , and Guenneau, S. (2013). Acoustic Metamaterials ( Springer, Berlin).
3.
3. de Hoop, A. T. (1995). Handbook of Radiation and Scattering of Waves ( Academic, London).
4.
4. Fokkema, J. T. , and van den Berg, P. M. (1993). Seismic Applications of Acoustic Reciprocity ( Elsevier, Amsterdam).
5.
5. Friot, E. , Guillermin, R. , and Winniger, M. (2006). “ Active control of scattered acoustic radiation: A real-time implementation for a three-dimensional object,” Acta Acust. Acust. 92, 278288.
6.
6. Malyuzhinets, G. D. (1964). “ On one theorem on analytical functions and its extension to the wave potentials,” in Proceedings of the 3rd All-Union Symposium on Wave Diffraction ( Nauka, Moscow), pp. 113116.
7.
7. Pendry, J. B. (2000). “ Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(18), 39663969.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966
8.
8. Uosukainen, S. (2003). “ Active sound scatterers based on JMC method,” J. Sound Vib. 23, 383390.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00218-9
9.
9. van Manen, D.-J. , Robertsson, J. O. A. , and Curtis, A. (2007). “ Exact wave field simulation for finite-volume scattering problems,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122(4), EL115EL121.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2771371
10.
10. Vasmel, M. , Robertsson, J. O. A. , and Amundsen, L. (2014). “ A new solution to eliminate free surface related multiples in multicomponent streamer recordings,” in 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
11.
11. Vasmel, M. , Robertsson, J. O. A. , van Manen, D.-J. , and Curtis, A. (2013). “ Immersive experimentation in a wave propagation laboratory,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134(6), EL492EL498.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4826912
12.
12. Wapenaar, K. (2007). “ General representations for wavefield modeling and inversion in geophysics,” Geophysics 72(5), SM5SM17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.2750646
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921340
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921340
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921340
2015-05-22
2016-09-27

Abstract

Broadband cloaking and holography are achieved by creating an exact boundary condition on a surface enclosing an object or free space. A time-recursive, discrete version of the Kirchhoff–Helmholtz integral predicts the wavefield impinging on the surface, as well as its transmission through an arbitrary embedding or replacement medium. Surface source distributions proportional to the predicted wavefield cancel the incident waves and radiate the desired response. The fields inside and outside the surface can be controlled independently. A two-dimensional numerical example shows that cloaking and holography can be achieved to within numerical precision across the frequency range of the incident radiation.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/1.4921340.html;jsessionid=e2fCvkuEsjNwqRgLMOCKPhfj.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921340&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921340&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921340'
Right1,Right2,Right3,