Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921675
1.
1. T. J. Cox and P. D'Antonio, Acoustic Absorbers and Diffusers ( Taylor and Francis, London, 2009), pp. 252288.
2.
2. M. A. Heckl, “ Numerical methods,” in Modern Methods in Analytical Acoustics: Lecture Notes, edited by D. G. Crighton, A. P. Dowling, J. E. Ffowcs Williams, M. A. Heckl, and F. A. Leppington ( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992), pp. 283310.
3.
3. J. A. Hargreaves and T. J. Cox, “ A transient boundary element method model of Schroeder diffuser scattering using well mouth impedance,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 29422951 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2982420
4.
4. J. A. Hargreaves, “ Time domain boundary element method for room acoustics,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Salford, Salford, UK, 2007, pp. 218. Available at http://usir.salford.ac.uk/16604/ (Last viewed February 5, 2015).
5.
5. J. Sheaffer, M. van Walstijn, and B. M. Fazenda, “ Physical and numerical constraints in source modeling for finite difference simulation of room acoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 251261 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4836355
6.
6. U. P. Svensson, R. I. Fred, and J. Vanderkooy, “ An analytic secondary source model of edge diffraction impulse responses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 23312334 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.428071
7.
7. P. D'Antonio and J. H. Konnert, “ The reflection phase grating diffusor: Design theory and application,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 32, 228238 (1984).
8.
8. K. Kowalczyk, M. van Walstijn, and D. T. Murphy, “ A phase grating approach to modeling surface diffusion in FDTD room acoustics simulations,” IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Language Processing 19(5), 528537 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2010.2051830
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921675
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921675
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921675
2015-05-29
2016-12-06

Abstract

Time-domain prediction models have been developed for auditorium reflectors and room acoustic diffusers. The models are time-domain equivalents of the single-frequency formulations that exploit the Kirchhoff boundary conditions. Consequently, they are approximate, wave-based solutions to the Kirchhoff integral equation using surface meshes. The new time-domain formulations are validated by comparison to their frequency-domain equivalents for three different surfaces: a plane surface, a curved reflector, and a Schroeder diffuser. In terms of computation time and accuracy, the new models lie between the finite difference time domain and geometric room models.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/1.4921675.html;jsessionid=EZnQEbUOJm0y_m96bQcuEWTn.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921675&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921675&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4921675'
Right1,Right2,Right3,