Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4922012
1.
1. Bogliotti, C. , Serniclaes, W. , Messaoud-Galusi, S. , and Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2008). “ Discrimination of speech sounds by children with dyslexia: Comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls,” J. Exp. Child Psychol. 101, 137155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.03.006
2.
2. Brungart, D. , Simpson, B. , Ericson, M. , and Scott, K. (2001). “ Informational and Energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 25272538.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1408946
3.
3. Calcus, A. , Colin, C. , Deltenre, P. , and Kolinsky, R. (2015). “ Informational masking of complex tones in dyslexic children,” Neurosci. Lett. 584, 7176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.026
4.
4. Chandrasekaran, B. , Hornickel, J. , Skoe, E. , Nicol, T. , and Kraus, N. (2009). “ Context-dependent encoding in the human auditory brainstem relates to hearing speech in noise: Implications for developmental Dyslexia,” Neuron 64, 311319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.10.006
5.
5. Dole, M. , Hoen, M. , and Meunier, F. (2012). “ Speech-in-noise perception deficit in adults with dyslexia: Effects of background type and listening configuration,” Neuropsychologia 50, 15431552.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.007
6.
6. Durlach, N. , Mason, C. , Kidd, G. , Arbogast, T. , Colburn, S. , and Shinn-Cunningham, B. (2003). “ Note on informational masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 29842987.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1570435
7.
7. Hazan, V. , Messaoud-Galusi, S. , and Rosen, S. (2013). “ The effect of talker and intonation variability on speech perception in noise in children with dyslexia,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 56, 4462.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0107)
8.
8. Messaoud-Galusi, S. , Hazan, V. , and Rosen, S. (2011). “ Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: Is there evidence of a consistent deficit in individuals?,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 54, 16821701.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/09-0261)
9.
9. Miller, G. , and Niceley, P. (1955). “ An analysis of perception confusions among some English consonants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 338352.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907526
10.
10. Mousty, P. , and Leybaert, J. (1999). “Evaluation des habiletés de lecture et d'orthographe au moyen de BELEC: Données longitudinales auprès d'enfants francophones testés en 2ème et 4ème années” (“Evaluation of reading and orthographic abilities using BELEC: Longitudinal data from French speaking children in 2nd and 4th Grade”), Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée 49, 325342.
11.
11. Neff, D. , and Green, D. (1987). “ Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers,” Percept. Psychophys. 41, 409415.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03203033
12.
12. Pattamadilok, C. , Morais, J. , and Kolinsky, R. (2011). “ Naming in noise: The contribution of orthographic knowledge to speech repetition,” Frontiers Psychol. 2, 112.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00361
13.
13. Poelmans, H. , Luts, H. , Vandermosten, M. , Boets, B. , Ghesquière, P. , and Wouters, J. (2011). “ Reduced sensitivity to slow-rate dynamic auditory information in children with dyslexia,” Res. Dev. Disabilities 32, 28102819.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.025
14.
14. Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). “ Object-based auditory and visual attention,” Trends Cognit. Sci. 12, 182186.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.003
15.
15. Simpson, S. , and Cooke, M. (2005). “ Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 27752778.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2062650
16.
16. Smith, K. , and Griffiths, P. (1987). “ Defective lateralized attention for non-verbal sounds in developmental dyslexia,” Neuropsychologia 25, 259268.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90136-9
17.
17. Snowling, M. (2000). “ The definition of dyslexia,” in Dyslexia, 2nd ed. ( Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 1429.
18.
18. Stone, M. , Füllgrabe, C. , and Moore, B. (2012). “ Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 317326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4725766
19.
19. Vellutino, F. , Fletcher, J. , Snowling, M. , and Scanlon, D. (2004). “ Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?,” J. Child Psych. Psych. 45, 240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
20.
20. Wightman, F. , Kistler, D. , and O'Bryan, A. (2010). “ Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 270279.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3436536
21.
21. Zeng, F.-G. , Nie, K. , Stickney, G. , Kong, Y.-Y. , Vongphoe, M. , Bhargave, A. , Wei, C. , and Cao, K. (2005). “ Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 22932298.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406460102
22.
22. Ziegler, J. C. , Pech-Georgel, C. , George, F. , and Lorenzi, C. (2009). “ Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia,” Dev. Sci. 12, 732745.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00817.x
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4922012
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4922012
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4922012
2015-06-01
2016-12-06

Abstract

Studies evaluating speech perception in noise have reported inconsistent results regarding a potential deficit in dyslexic children. So far, most of them investigated energetic masking. The present study evaluated situations inducing mostly informational masking, which reflects cognitive interference induced by the masker. Dyslexic children were asked to identify a female target syllable presented in quiet, babble, unmodulated, and modulated speech-shaped noise. Whereas their performance was comparable to normal-reading children in quiet, it dropped significantly in all noisy conditions compared to age-, but not reading level-matched controls. Interestingly, noise affected similarly the reception of voicing, place, and manner of articulation in dyslexic and normal-reading children.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/1.4922012.html;jsessionid=n2eU21ZI76y7qe8UZnDUXzTg.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4922012&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4922012&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/137/6/10.1121/1.4922012'
Right1,Right2,Right3,