Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922366
1.
1. A. Lee, T. Whitehill, V. Ciocca, and N. Samman, “ Acoustic and perceptual analysis of the sibilant sound /s/ before and after orthognathic surgery,” J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 60, 364372 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.31221
2.
2. E. Bond and W. Lawson, “ Speech and its relation to dentistry. I. Speech and speech defects,” Dent. Pract. Dent. Rec. 19(5), 7582 (1968).
3.
3. S. Pound, “ Let /s/ be your guide,” J. Prosthes. Dent. 38(5), 482489 (1977).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90022-1
4.
4. E. Mehringer, “ The use of speech patterns as an aid in prosthodontic reconstruction,” J. Prosthes. Dent. 13(5), 825836 (1963).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90226-9
5.
5. C. Runte, M. Lawerino, D. Dirksen, F. Bollmann, A. Lamprecht-Dinnesen, and E. Seifert, “ The influence of maxillary central incisor position in complete dentures on /s/ sound production,” J. Prosthes. Dent. 85(5), 485495 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114448
6.
6. J. Hufnagle, P. Pullon, and K. Hufnagle, “ Speech considerations in oral surgery. Part II. Speech characteristics of patients following surgery for oral malignancies,” Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 46, 354361 (1978).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(78)90399-7
7.
7. G. Fant, The Acoustic Theory of Speech Production ( Mouton, The Hague, the Netherlands, 1960), 1002 pp.
8.
8. S. McLeod, A. Roberts, and J. Sita, “ Tongue/palate contact for the production of /s/ and /z/,” Clin. Ling. Phonetics 20(1), 5166 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699200400021331
9.
9.EVA2 datasheet, Technical report, http://www.sqlab.fr/doc/PlaquetteEvaENU0501.pdf (Last viewed 2009).
10.
10. K. Nozaki, T. Yoshinaga, and S. Wada, “ Sibilant /s/ simulator based on computed tomography images and dental casts,” J. Dent. Res. 93, 207211 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034513514586
11.
11. J. Cisonni, A. Van Hirtum, J. Willems, and X. Pelorson, “ Theoretical simulation and experimental validation of inverse quasi-one-dimensional steady and unsteady glottal flow models,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124(1), 535545 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2931959
12.
12. D. Warren and A. DuBois, “ A pressure-flow technique for measuring velopharyngeal orifice area during continuous speech,” Cleft Palate J. 1, 5271 (1964).
13.
13. S. Narayanan, A. Alwan, and K. Haker, “ An articulatory study of fricative consonants using magnetic resonance imaging,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 13251347 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.413469
14.
14. C. Shadle and C. Scully, “ An articulatory-acoustic-aerodynamics analysis of /s/ in VCV sequences,” J. Phonetics 23(3), 5366 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80032-8
15.
15. B. Wu, A. Van Hirtum, and X. Luo, “ Pressure driven steady flow in constricted channels of different cross section shapes,” Int. J. Appl. Mech. 5, 119 (2013).
16.
16. N. Timm, Handbook of Statistics ( Motilal Banarsisdass Publisher, Delhi, India, 1980), pp. 4187.
17.
17. N. Lass, Ed., Contemporary Issues in Experimental Phonetics ( Elsevier, New York, 1976), pp. 105137.
18.
18. K. Stevens, “ Airflow and turbulence noise for fricative and stop consonants: Static considerations,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 50, 11801192 (1971).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1912751
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922366
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922366
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922366
2015-07-08
2016-09-26

Abstract

Speech screening of sibilant fricative phonemes is an important tool for oral health care. Nevertheless, screening as a function of quantitative geometrical markers is mostly limited to teeth features whereas the minimum area of the narrowed air passage upstream from the tooth is known to be a key production feature. The minimum area is estimated from non-invasive aerodynamic measurements using a laminar flow model. The influence of viscid flow losses on the area estimation is shown to be negligible. Current data suggest that speech screening is most effective for phoneme /s/, which supports common practice in oral health care.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/1.4922366.html;jsessionid=4Y7jZYgb65njvMAYYukJkvAP.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922366&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922366&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922366'
Right1,Right2,Right3,