Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922762
1.
1. S. Ash, “ The distribution of a phonemic split in the Mid-Atlantic region: Yet more on short a,” U. Penn Working Papers Ling. 8(3), 115 (2002).
2.
2. W. Labov, “ Exact description of the speech community: Short a in Philadelphia,” in Language Change and Variation, edited by R. W. Fasold and D. Schiffrin ( Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, 1989), pp. 157.
3.
3. S. Dufour, N. Nguyen, and U. H. Frauenfelder, “ The perception of phonemic contrasts in a non-native dialect,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121(4), EL131EL136 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2710742
4.
4. S. Dufour, N. Nguyen, and U. H. Frauenfelder, “ Does training on a phonemic contrast absent in the listener's dialect influence word recognition?,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128(1), EL43EL48 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3431102
5.
5. T. L. Gottfried, “ Effects of consonant context on the perception of French vowels,” J. Phonetics 12(2), 91114 (1984).
6.
6. D. C. Walker, The Pronunciation of Canadian French ( Ottawa University Press, Ottawa, 1984), pp. 3289.
7.
7. J. Boshoer and R. Mougeon, “ Les réalisations par des élèves d'immersion de [e] et [ɛ] en position finale accentuée dans les formes verbales” (“The achievements by immersion students [e] and [ɛ] in stressed final position in the verbal forms”), in French Studies ( York University, North York, Ontario, 2004).
8.
8. P. Martin, “ Le système vocalique du français du Québec. De l'acoustique à la phonologie” (“The vowel system of French Quebec. From the acoustic phonology”), La Linguistique 38(2), 7188 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ling.382.0071
9.
9. D. Johnston, Cool Edit Pro, Syntrillium Software Corporation, Phoenix, Arizona (1999).
10.
10. T. L. Gottfried and P. S. Beddor, “ Perception of temporal and spectral information in French vowels,” Lang. Speech 31, pt. 1(3), 5175 (1988).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002383098803100103
11.
11. J. L. Miller, M. Mondini, F. Grosjean, and J.-Y. Dommergues, “ Dialect effects in speech perception: The role of vowel duration in Parisian French and Swiss French,” Lang. Speech 54(4), 467485 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0023830911404924
12.
12. W. R. Klecka, Discriminant Analysis ( Sage Publication, Newbury Park, CA, 1980).
13.
13. B. Lindblom, “ Temporal organization of syllable production,” STL-QPSR 9(2–3), 15 (1968). Retrieved from http://www.speech.kth.se/prod/publications/files/qpsr/1968/1968_9_2-3_001-005.pdf (Last viewed June 15, 2015).
14.
14. W. Strange, A. Weber, E. S. Levy, V. Shafiro, M. Hisagi, and K. Nishi, “ Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122(2), 11111129 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2749716
15.
15. C. Pallier, L. Bosch, and N. Sebastián-Gallés, “ A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception,” Cognition 64(3), B9B17 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00030-9
16.
16. C. Pallier, A. Colomé, and N. Sebastián-Gallés, “ The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based vs. abstract lexical entries,” Psychol. Sci. 12(6), 445449 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00383
17.
17. L. Bosch and N. Sebastián-Gallés, “ Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life,” Lang. Speech 46(2–3), 217243 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020801
18.
18. W. Strange, E. S. Levy, and F. Law II, “ Cross-language categorization of French and German vowels by naive American listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126(3), 14611476 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3179666
19.
19. E. Jacewicz, R. A. Fox, and J. Salmons, “ Vowel duration in three American English dialects,” Am. Speech 82(4), 367385 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2007-024
20.
20. M. Picard, Phonetics and Phonology for ESL and TESL Teachers ( Concordia University, Montreal, 2001).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922762
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922762
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922762
2015-07-13
2016-12-03

Abstract

This study analyzed Canadian French (CF) vowels /i y ø e ɛ o u a/ in word-final position. Of particular interest was the stability of /e-ɛ/; although some dialects of French have merged /e-ɛ/ to /e/ in word-final context, this contrast is maintained in CF. The present study investigated the stability of this contrast in various preceding phonetic contexts and in lexical vs morphological contrasts. Results showed that the contrast was maintained by all four speakers, although to varying degrees.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/1.4922762.html;jsessionid=EXeoMZSsXU0Nso2u3v5Xbzaf.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922762&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922762&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/1/10.1121/1.4922762'
Right1,Right2,Right3,